We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Legal Conundrum
Tony_H_3
Posts: 2,644 Forumite
If you are required to do something in order to maintain your employment (legislation / law) and by doing so it causes another (legislation / law) to be broken, what do you do?
0
Comments
-
If you are required to do something in order to maintain your employment (legislation / law) and by doing so it causes another (legislation / law) to be broken, what do you do?
Bit too vague.
If I were a lift operator and asked to kill a man so that we did not have too many passengers in the lift, I have a strong suspicion I would say no. :rotfl:0 -
Specifics:
I have to have a medical (group 2) and by doing so this will cause me to be financially worse off than my younger colleagues.
There may be options where I might be able to get some or all of the money back, but this doesn't change the conundrum.0 -
Could you explain how your first post relates to your second.
I'm guessing the thing you are required to do to keep your employment is have a medical?
Not sure how paying for a medical is against the law though.Originally Posted by shortcrust
"Contact the Ministry of Fairness....If sufficient evidence of unfairness is discovered you’ll get an apology, a permanent contract with backdated benefits, a ‘Let’s Make it Fair!’ tshirt and mug, and those guilty of unfairness will be sent on a Fairness Awareness course."0 -
which laws do you think are being broken?0
-
Specifics:
I have to have a medical (group 2) and by doing so this will cause me to be financially worse off than my younger colleagues.
There may be options where I might be able to get some or all of the money back, but this doesn't change the conundrum.
Why would you be paid less? Do you have to pay for it?
Are you saying you have to have the medical because of your age or is it because of some other reason?0 -
You have to have a medical at a certain age (legislation I think), which means colleagues whom are younger than you (age discrimination) do not. All I am asking is, is it right that Government legislation causes a law to be broken.
If your employer was legally responsible to cover the cost of the medical no wrong doing would occur. As it stands the burden of responsibility lies with the employee needing the medical.
If my thoughts on this are legitimate, are there any other circumstances where legislation causes a law to be broken? It makes me wonder.0 -
I suspect OP thinks that needing medicals due to age is also covered by age discriminations laws.
Needs to be much more specific because I suspect the OP does not know what the age discriminations law applies to in enough detail to be sure it covers medicals on age grounds.
The Equality Act 2010 will be the specific legislation that will apply perhaps the OP can point to the relevant part of that.0 -
getmore4less wrote: »I suspect OP thinks that needing medicals due to age is also covered by age discriminations laws.
Needs to be much more specific because I suspect the OP does not know what the age discriminations law applies to in enough detail to be sure it covers medicals on age grounds.
The Equality Act 2010 will be the specific legislation that will apply perhaps the OP can point to the relevant part of that.
Drivers of HGV / PSV have to have a medical at 45, then every 5 years to 65 and annually after that.
I had no idea that the Equality Act might have get out clauses, but even if it does I think it's wrong and discrimination. I always knew I would need a medical at 45 (it's been like that for years), but I never really thought about it. Now that time has come I think it's a little unfair that I will be financially worse off that colleagues under 45 year of age.
When all is said and done, from a personal point of view it's only a cost of £75.00 to £130 if you shop around for that medical. It's more about principle and whether or not their might be similar circumstances other employees which might cause discrimination.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards