We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Investment choices for 'spare' SIPP money
Comments
-
I think if you have a decent cash buffer from other savings and what is left from the 25% TFLS after the refurbishments I would stick the £18k in the Vanguard LS40 with the rest.I’m a Forum Ambassador and I support the Forum Team on the Debt free Wannabe, Budgeting and Banking and Savings and Investment boards. If you need any help on these boards, do let me know. Please note that Ambassadors are not moderators. Any posts you spot in breach of the Forum Rules should be reported via the report button, or by emailing forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com. All views are my own and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.
The 365 Day 1p Challenge 2025 #1 £667.95/£430.71
Save £12k in 2025 #1 £12000/£120000 -
enthusiasticsaver wrote: »I think if you have a decent cash buffer from other savings and what is left from the 25% TFLS after the refurbishments I would stick the £18k in the Vanguard LS40 with the rest.Someone more expert can advise on this but if the £18k has come out of a DC pension as part of the TFLS are you allowed to put this into a SIPP? I thought this was considered recycling.0
-
retireetobe wrote: »Ah, sorry if I misled. The £18K is just part of the original DC transfer so is already in the SIPP, it's not being added later. It's just that the £18K is currently sat there as cash because I wasn't sure whether to invest the entire £98K into VLS40 or do something different with part of it.
What's your overall asset allocation. Cash in a SIPP or on a bank account is still cash.“So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past.”0 -
Thrugelmir wrote: »Profit does not equate to cash generated. Cash flow statements are far more important than P&L accounts. Profits can be massaged. The market decides if capital has been wisely allocated.
A company might carefully calculate the dividend it wants to pay. Or it might guess. Or it might follow some long-term trend set decades ago. Whichever, it seems a bit arbitrary to use the declared dividend as a yardstick for how much to spend from a portfolio in retirement.
Spending only portfolio natural yield guarantees that your heirs get more of your cash than you do! If that's your aim then fine. But I don't think it's everyone's aim. It's not mine.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards