We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Children savings that can't be accessed automatically at 18
Comments
-
I found a link:
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5012333
My memory wasn't quite right (it was 3 years ago). The question was whether it was possible for the adult child to get the money without a court order and the answer appears to be no. It is not enough for the child to tell the company he is entitled to it.
I believe the only options are to try to remove the trustee or "break the trust", both of which involve the courts (unless the terms of the trust allow an easier means to replace trustees) and therefore a practical barrier. If an 18 year old is motivated and competent enough to see the process through then I hope they are responsible enough to use the money wisely too!0 -
The child would have to be informed of the existence of the trust once he became responsible for his own tax affairs.
http://www.lawdonut.co.uk/personal/inheritance-tax-and-family-trusts/trusts-for-children-and-other-family-members-faqs
https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/0-107-6471?__lrTS=20170411025445184&transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)&firstPage=true&bhcp=10 -
From the perspective of the investment company, bare trust accounts are often just an ordinary unwrapped account with a designation attached - usually a series of letters which the trustee knows is the child's initials but from the perspective of investment company is just an abstract set of letters.
This needs care - there is a difference between an account which is merely "designated" ("revocable basis") and one which is held in bare trust ('irrevocable basis").
https://www.trustnet.com/Education/SaveChild.aspx?ms=50 -
The last dozen or posts confirm my thought that it's far easier to save in your own name earmarked for the child, and hand over when you think appropriate.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

