Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

The Tories start recycling campaigns

Theresa May has stated that if she wins the GE, she will cap energy prices.

I seem to remember the Labour Party made exactly the same promise at the last election.

What will be the next election promise made by one party previously, be the next one to be recycled by another.
Never Knowingly Understood.

Member #1 of £1,000 challenge - £13.74/ £1000 (that's 1.374%)

3-6 month EF £0/£3600 (that's 0 days worth)

Comments

  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 9 May 2017 at 9:57PM
    Does it matter as long as someone takes action. In reality the policies that can be implemented from the various manifesto pledges are somewhat constrained.

    Doesn't guarantee cheaper bills in the longer term. At least people won't have to waste their time comparing hundreds of different tariffs. In order to get a good deal.
  • IveSeenTheLight
    IveSeenTheLight Posts: 13,322 Forumite
    Thrugelmir wrote: »
    Does it matter as long as someone takes action. In reality the policies that can be implemented from the various manifesto pledges are somewhat constrained.

    Doesn't guarantee cheaper bills in the longer term. At least people won't have to waste their time comparing hundreds of different tariffs. In order to get a good deal.

    Theres a bit of debate surrounding the Conservative version and the likelyhood that it would increase the overal cost of energy.

    The cap as (I heard on the radio) was the difference between the lowest and highest tarrifs in order to close the gap and the consensus was that this would likely just push up the lower rates proportionally more than the higher rates reduce.

    Looks like its political posturing for Election purposes but not improve the issue in reality
    :wall:
    What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
    Some men you just can't reach.
    :wall:
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    The cap as (I heard on the radio) was the difference between the lowest and highest tarrifs in order to close the gap and the consensus was that this would likely just push up the lower rates proportionally more than the higher rates reduce.

    At least introduces a degree of fairness. An OAP of 85 is far less likely to go trawling the internet for the best deal.
  • System
    System Posts: 178,353 Community Admin
    10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    patman99 wrote: »
    What will be the next election promise made by one party previously, be the next one to be recycled by another.


    Labour to increase Inheritance Tax allowance to £1m

    Conservatives to nationalise steel industry

    Liberal Democrats to halt all immigration

    UKIP to campaign to re-join EU

    SNP to propose union of Scottish and English parliaments

    Plaid Cymru to make English sole official language in official documents
    This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com
  • IveSeenTheLight
    IveSeenTheLight Posts: 13,322 Forumite
    Thrugelmir wrote: »
    At least introduces a degree of fairness. An OAP of 85 is far less likely to go trawling the internet for the best deal.


    The theory is that it will not introduce fairness, just increase prices.

    As a hypothetical example, if the lowest dual fuel was £800 a year and the highest was £1200 a year with an average of £1000 a year, there is a £400 variance.

    If the cap stated it should be no more than £200 from top to bottom, then the energy companies could make the lowest £950 with the highest £1150.

    Net result, the average is £1050 and prices have went up.

    I agree with the premise to try and make it easier for loyal customers to remain on good deals, but it sounds like this policy is open to manipulation.
    :wall:
    What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
    Some men you just can't reach.
    :wall:
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    The theory is that it will not introduce fairness, just increase prices.

    As with anything someone has to pay. Reducing prices for some customers will increase it for others. If the burden is more equitably spread so be it. Perhaps then people will use energy more efficiently.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.