We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Colleague Made Permanent

I work FullTime/Permanent in an office. A colleague of mine has been made permanent after 4 or 5 years of working under temporary contracts.
Someone else within our department has an equal amount of service under the same conditions, similar level of responsibility but is still a temp. He has a meeting at the end of the week with management, what would be the best questions to ask why they’ve not been made permanent?

Comments

  • TELLIT01
    TELLIT01 Posts: 18,604 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper PPI Party Pooper
    I would have thought that simply asking that direct question would be the best way forward. It could be a case that the company is limited on how many people they are able to make permanent at this time, and that his time may come.
  • I would ask not in an upset "they have gone permanent so why have I not been offered?" way, but in a positive "I really like working here and it is a great opportunity to go permanent if this was possible as I am very interested".
  • getmore4less
    getmore4less Posts: 46,882 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper I've helped Parliament
    if the contracts are direct and renewed and no other terms change then then permanent has no real benefit as they have the same employment protections anyway.
  • TELLIT01
    TELLIT01 Posts: 18,604 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper PPI Party Pooper
    if the contracts are direct and renewed and no other terms change then then permanent has no real benefit as they have the same employment protections anyway.

    Do staff on fixed term contracts automatically have the same entitlement to pension, annual increments, bonuses etc.
  • KiKi
    KiKi Posts: 5,381 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    Pa_Ja wrote: »
    I work FullTime/Permanent in an office. A colleague of mine has been made permanent after 4 or 5 years of working under temporary contracts.
    Someone else within our department has an equal amount of service under the same conditions, similar level of responsibility but is still a temp. He has a meeting at the end of the week with management, what would be the best questions to ask why they’ve not been made permanent?

    When you say 'temp', do you mean directly employed by the organisation on a 'fixed term' contract which is renewed each year (or so), or do you mean working for the company through an agency?
    ' <-- See that? It's called an apostrophe. It does not mean "hey, look out, here comes an S".
  • KiKi
    KiKi Posts: 5,381 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    TELLIT01 wrote: »
    Do staff on fixed term contracts automatically have the same entitlement to pension, annual increments, bonuses etc.

    Yes, unless it can be justified by a very good business reason..
    ' <-- See that? It's called an apostrophe. It does not mean "hey, look out, here comes an S".
  • xapprenticex
    xapprenticex Posts: 1,760 Forumite
    2 years+ aside, The difference is, at the end of the term the person can be sent on their way, if its permanent then the only way is redundancy. if someone has to go it will be the person on the rolling contract.
  • sangie595
    sangie595 Posts: 6,092 Forumite
    2 years+ aside, The difference is, at the end of the term the person can be sent on their way, if its permanent then the only way is redundancy. if someone has to go it will be the person on the rolling contract.

    No, it isn't. Redundancy rights are based on continuous employment. The termination of a fixed term contract for no other reason than it is fixed term is unlawful. People on "rolling contracts" must be treated in the same way as anyone else with the same amount of service. Including for redundancy. In the eyes of the law, there is no difference.
  • xapprenticex
    xapprenticex Posts: 1,760 Forumite
    sangie595 wrote: »
    No, it isn't. Redundancy rights are based on continuous employment. The termination of a fixed term contract for no other reason than it is fixed term is unlawful. People on "rolling contracts" must be treated in the same way as anyone else with the same amount of service. Including for redundancy. In the eyes of the law, there is no difference.

    Ahh, And Welcome Back :money:
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.