We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Does 3 months in a job role make you highly experienced?
Comments
-
It depends on the job. Some jobs are extremely basic and you could know everything you could about the role in 3 months. Some jobs you could do for a decade and still not know everything. I would say that in the majority of jobs you aren't 'highly experienced' after 3 months.
However I think your taking the judge out of context and I'd dismiss any ideas of lodging an appeal based on this. I suspect what the judge was saying is that you were experienced enough to not make the mistake you did but with the tiny amount of information you've provided it's hard to say. Also something doesn't add up, if you'd only been working for the company for 3 months you can't take them to a tribunal anyway.
Had you come here before people could have given you advice as to how solid your case was.0 -
This is going to drive you nuts unless you try and put it behind you and move on. The tribunal chair will be a judge, the other two members not necessarily. They will find in favour of your employer if the decision they took falls within the band of reasonable decisions a person might take when faced with the same situation. They don't necessarily agree with the decision. You may have only been in that particular job role for 3 months but how long working for the company? You were given that position for a reason and they - and you? - felt there was no need for training. It could be the best thing if you find a more suitable position, in five years who knows. Move on.Mr Generous - Landlord for more than 10 years. Generous? - Possibly but sarcastic more likely.0
-
What did you do, forget to ask if they wanted fries with that.
3 months, highly experienced...not in many jobs.0 -
Wow, people on these forums are always so quick to tell people to get over something and move on. This is a place for discussion and sharing experiences, ideas, or find an explanation for something. Don't be so dismissive, someone else might find this helpful in the future.0
-
Wow, people on these forums are always so quick to tell people to get over something and move on. This is a place for discussion and sharing experiences, ideas, or find an explanation for something. Don't be so dismissive, someone else might find this helpful in the future.
In this particular case telling the OP to get over it is the best advice. He lost the ET case, there is nothing he can do except move on with his life and look for another job.If you are querying your Council Tax band would you please state whether you are in England, Scotland or Wales0 -
I agree with the majority of posters that it depends on what the job is. Data entry might be mastered in a few weeks whereas a doctor would take years to become highly experienced. However could the judge have been referring to your overall career history not just this particular job? If you only worked for 3 months at company x but previously you had worked for 5 years in a similar role elsewhere, you could still be deemed highly experienced.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
