We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Full and final settlement terminology - does it need amending ?
sourcrates
Posts: 32,524 Ambassador
Hi folks,
Been a few posts of late where long term DMP`ers, and others, have reached the stage of making settlement offers to some of there creditors.
There has been some confusion about exactly whats meant by a "full and final settlement offer", and how it should be marked on your credit file.
The very name itself "full and final settlement" tends to send the wrong message, as your not paying in full are you, your asking the creditor to accept a partial settlement payment, of less than the outstanding balance, to pay off the debt.
Likewise your credit file would reflect that, and be marked as a "partial settlement".
So my question is, do you think the terminology needs changing to make things clearer ?
Not just on these forums, but essentially across the board so the debt charities, National Debtline etc etc all use it too.
Be interesting to hear your thoughts.
Been a few posts of late where long term DMP`ers, and others, have reached the stage of making settlement offers to some of there creditors.
There has been some confusion about exactly whats meant by a "full and final settlement offer", and how it should be marked on your credit file.
The very name itself "full and final settlement" tends to send the wrong message, as your not paying in full are you, your asking the creditor to accept a partial settlement payment, of less than the outstanding balance, to pay off the debt.
Likewise your credit file would reflect that, and be marked as a "partial settlement".
So my question is, do you think the terminology needs changing to make things clearer ?
Not just on these forums, but essentially across the board so the debt charities, National Debtline etc etc all use it too.
Be interesting to hear your thoughts.
I’m a Forum Ambassador and I support the Forum Team on the Debt free wannabe, Credit file and ratings, and Bankruptcy and living with it boards. If you need any help on these boards, do let me know. Please note that Ambassadors are not moderators. Any posts you spot in breach of the Forum Rules should be reported via the report button, or by emailing forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com. All views are my own and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.For free non-judgemental debt advice, contact either Stepchange, National Debtline, or CitizensAdviceBureaux.Link to SOA Calculator- https://www.stoozing.com/soa.php The "provit letter" is here-https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/2607247/letter-when-you-know-nothing-about-about-the-debt-aka-prove-it-letter
0
Comments
-
Yes, this is funny one. I am not sure about changing it even though I have been thinking about it a few times. I think it should be clear between debtor and creditor that this is full and final settlement even though agreed amount for it is less than the outstanding debt. I look at this that the particular agreement has been settled fully , ie no further chasing or selling debt. By making this payment both sides agree that their relationship is fully settled and it's final. However banks should have opportunity to mark the credit file in a way that reflects that. So they cannot mark it as debt was settled in full. So this creates misunderstanding. I don't know how this could be changed. May be the clue should be in the word "settlement" and maybe there is no need to add full and final, or maybe just final should be ok...0
-
'Full' implies paying off the debt for the whole amount owed.
'Settlement' implies an official agreement intended to resolve the debt.
'Partial' implies part/incomplete payment
Therefore, to me anyway, it makes sense for the term to be 'Partial' and 'Settlement'
Just my opinion
DFW Nerd No. 1484 LBM 07/01/15 Debt was £95k :eek: Now debt free and happy :j0 -
Yes, but if it's partial payment that's fine, but settlement needs to be final. I don't know what in legal term partial settlement would mean? That you settled part of the agreement and there is still the other part to settle?0
-
somuchindebt wrote: »Yes, but if it's partial payment that's fine, but settlement needs to be final. I don't know what in legal term partial settlement would mean? That you settled part of the agreement and there is still the other part to settle?
For me it's when the two words are put together, which is why I put the definition of each word.
Partial (incomplete)
final (end of the matter)
settlement (resolve the matter).
As I said, it's my opinion but I do think the term full and final settlement is more confusing. At no point is anyone of this forum making full final settlement in repayment of their debts. They are making partial and final settlements.DFW Nerd No. 1484 LBM 07/01/15 Debt was £95k :eek: Now debt free and happy :j0 -
So best to have it as final settlement
"final settlement
n. an agreement reached by the parties to a lawsuit, usually in writing and/or read into the record in court, settling all issues. Usually there are elements of compromise, waiver of any right to re-open or appeal the matter even if there is information found later which would change matters (such as recurrence of a problem with an injury), mutual release of any further claim by each party, a statement that neither side is admitting fault, and some action or payment by one or both sides. In short, the case is over, provided the parties do what they are supposed to do according to the final settlement's terms. With the glut of cases crowding court calendars and overwhelming the system and delays in getting to trial (due to three factors: increased criminal case load, increased litigious nature of society, and an insufficient number of judges), judges encourage attempts to settle, including mandatory settlement conferences with judges or experienced settlement attorneys present."
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/final+settlement0 -
I think whatever you call them there will be some explaining to do
Gives us something to do with our leisure time, Sourcrates.
Debt Camel gives a very clear explanation (as always) here
https://debtcamel.co.uk/debt-options/less-common/full-final/0 -
"Final Settlement" would avoid all confusion in the context of a negotiation.
E.g. "Write to Barclays to negotiate a final settlement on your debt"0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards