We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
HTB starts to sting

Graham_Devon
Posts: 58,560 Forumite


Didn't realise this, but it appears investors are buying up leaseholds on Help to Buy properties and then charging the owners as much as 16x the original cost to buy the freehold.
BBC entitle it as "the property trap effecting thousands".
I guess where there is profit to be made, people will make profit.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-38827661
BBC entitle it as "the property trap effecting thousands".
I guess where there is profit to be made, people will make profit.
What Bellway has done - selling a new home as leasehold, and then selling the freehold separately to an investment company without informing the family living there - is not illegal.
In British law, the "right of first refusal" applies to flats, but not houses. So it was not legally obliged to tell Katie it would do this.
For an investment company, buying groups of freeholds is a safe long-term investment. Receiving regular payments for ground rents - over leases that number well over 100 years - means safe, steady incomes, to fund things like pensions.
But nowhere on Bellway's website is this system made clear to potential buyers and Katie feels these facts were not made clear to her. She also says the solicitor - recommended to her by Bellway - made no mention of this possibility either.
Katie says because she bought the house through the government's Right To Buy scheme, she felt she could trust the process.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-38827661
0
Comments
-
This is nothing to do with HTB.0
-
I suppose the leaseholder always has this right.... pity the people drawn into these schemes are least likely to be able to protect themselves since they are used as funds generally are short?0
-
Graham_Devon wrote: »Didn't realise this, but it appears investors are buying up leaseholds on Help to Buy properties and then charging the owners as much as 16x the original cost to buy the freehold.
BBC entitle it as "the property trap effecting thousands".
I guess where there is profit to be made, people will make profit.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-38827661
This doesn't appear to have anything to do with help to buy.
It can and does happen to leasehold properties on newbuild sites regardless of whether they were bought through HTB.“The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.
Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”
-- President John F. Kennedy”0 -
Here's a suggestion for anyone who doesn't want to buy leasehold - don't buy leasehold. It's a radical idea I know.0
-
If you were told that buying the freehold would be 2-4k and not warned 'but that culd rapidly escalate to several times the upper value' by your solicitor then I would say you were mis-advised.
It is also unclear whether the value of the freehold really has gone up that much, was misrepresented originally, or perhaps the current owners are using the cost of forcing a fair valuation via the mechanism to try and get more for the freeholds than they are actually worth.
For example say the freehold is worth 5k but it costs another 6k to get that valuation confirmed then the freeholder can offer it to the leaseholder for 10.9k and be laughing....I think....0 -
The only lesson I see here is use a solicitor of YOUR choice so he is acting for your best interests, and read what you are sighing and discuss it with your solicitor if in doubt0
-
This is nothing to do with HTB.Don't blame me, I voted Remain.0
-
They really need to put a warning on Victoria Derbyshire related news story rubbish like they do with Newsbeat so that I'll know not to waste my time clicking the link. I'd read almost 2 paragraphs of that story earlier before I found out and closed the page. Po-faced idiocy.0
-
One of the developments I've been waiting to come up is a Bellway development oddly enough, but a leasehold flat not a house. Lenders typically steer clear of leasehold houses for all sorts of reasons.
£13k for a freehold is a bargain, I don't know what this woman is whinging about - this talk of her property having turned out to be a terrible investment is ridiculous. Trust a know nothing 'journalist' to get it all wrong yet again, more fake news.0 -
The only lesson I see here is use a solicitor of YOUR choice so he is acting for your best interests, and read what you are sighing and discuss it with your solicitor if in doubt
Definitely. It makes you wonder if the person they recommended is actually a solicitor as opposed to a licensed conveyancer. Fortunately though my sister is a property solicitor so I'd just get her on the caseShe's always saying the worst thing you can do is use the person they recommend, though I supposed she's biased.
“I could see that, if not actually disgruntled, he was far from being gruntled.” - P.G. Wodehouse0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards