We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

.............

13»

Comments

  • daytona0
    daytona0 Posts: 2,358 Forumite
    rjh29992 wrote: »

    Be thankful I haven't been sacked? I think if I was sacked for having a total of 15 days off sick due to genuine ongoing illness, which I have hospital discharge notes and doctors notes to prove, would be a pretty strong case for unfair dismissal.

    I picked up extra shifts this month as it has been over a month since any 'episodes' and I feel fine, and my workplace is aware of this.

    The Bradford factor seems like a pretty flawed scheme, I think it would work well for some, but when it's basically punishing staff who are genuinely ill, as well as encouraging staff with contagious illnesses like flu or stomach bugs to come into work even when sick because they don't want to mess up their bradford factor. Which is pretty bad when you work with vulnerable people.

    Been in a management position, albeit not deciding who stayed and went...

    Without a disability you would be a prime candidate when deciding who to get rid of first. If no evidence of a disability was provided (ie notifying the employer) or it wasn't obvious (ie you aren't blacking out in work) then what's your defence? You'd have no case.

    If evidence was provided then you'd more than likely be supported with something like reduced hours/duties, and potentially managed out.

    That, of course, assumes that your employer is the cut-throat type. Not all of them are this bad in fairness!

    On the subject of vulnerable people, but I have to raise a moral question. If you are blacking out occasionally, what impact would this have on the people you are supporting if you were to black out on them?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.