We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Girlfriend Moving in

Hi

I have a quick question and I am wondering if anyone can advise me
on it.

I have recently decided to allow my girlfriend to move in to my
house, which I own on a mortgage in my name only. We have been
together for a while now and whilst I am adamant everything will
go well between us, I am curious what would happen if we were to split
up ever. I have spoken to a number of friends about this and the best safeguard they
can advise me on is to allow her to pay half of the bills, excluding the mortgage
but in cash. That way if the unthinkable happens she will not have a legal
claim over my property.

Sorry to be so a negative-pegative on this matter but I’m just trying to
prepare myself for if something bad were to happen.

Regards

Philip

Comments

  • From what I remember your friends are pretty much right. In order to have a claim on your property she needs to prove that she has paid towards in in some way shape or form and as such has earned a share of it. So if you built a new extension and she paid for all of it, she would own a fair chunk of the house.

    Again, if she pays half the mortgage for 10 years then you split up, she has a right to it. However if she doesn't contribute to anything other than bills she shouldn't have any legal recourse on your property.

    This is going back to something I read a while ago when looking into exactly this, so don't take my word as gospel. Hopefully someone else will confirm soon enough.
  • https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/relationships/living-together-marriage-and-civil-partnership/living-together-and-marriage-legal-differences/

    "Common-law spouses

    Although the terms common-law wife or husband are frequently used to describe a couple who live together, these relationships do not have legal recognition."
    I am a Mortgage Broker
    You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Broker, so you need to take my word for it.
    This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser code of conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.
  • https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/relationships/living-together-marriage-and-civil-partnership/living-together-and-marriage-legal-differences/

    "Common-law spouses

    Although the terms common-law wife or husband are frequently used to describe a couple who live together, these relationships do not have legal recognition."

    Lower down on that page under Owner-Occupiers: Living together

    If you are the sole owner, you have a right to stay in the home. However, your partner may be able to claim a 'beneficial interest' in it – see below.

    If your partner is the sole owner, you may have no rights to remain in the home if you are asked to leave. However, if you have children, you can ask a court to transfer the property into your name. The court will only do this if it decides it is in the best interests of your children. It is usually done for a limited period, for example, until your youngest child is 18 years old.

    If you don't have children and your partner is the sole owner, the only way you may be able to claim long-term rights to the property is if you are able to show you have a 'beneficial interest' in it.

    Then this link is probably more relevant:
    https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/relationships/relationship-problems/relationship-breakdown-and-housing/if-you-live-with-your-partner-relationship-breakdown-and-housing/if-you-live-with-your-partner-and-you-own-your-home-relationship-breakdown-and-housing/relationship-breakdown-and-housing-beneficial-interest-if-your-partner-owns-the-home/
  • *edited - I'm wrong.

    "Implied trusts

    An implied trust is where a trust is said to exist because of how two parties have acted when they lived together. It may also be known as a resulting trust. It is established where:

    the non-owning partner made direct financial contributions to buying the property, and
    there was a common intention that the non-owning partner would have an interest in the property.
    Direct financial contributions can include payments towards:

    a deposit
    monthly mortgage payments
    capital due on the outstanding mortgage."
    I am a Mortgage Broker
    You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Broker, so you need to take my word for it.
    This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser code of conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.7K Life & Family
  • 259.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.