We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
MAking up the initial 2 years at the workplace
xapprenticex
Posts: 1,760 Forumite
Ill keep it short,
If you (And I mean 'I') start at a company via agency for 2 months then taken on by the company directly (permanently, as it were), does that reset the time to make the 2 years (have to work 24 months) or are the 2 months via agency taken into consideration?
Taa all
If you (And I mean 'I') start at a company via agency for 2 months then taken on by the company directly (permanently, as it were), does that reset the time to make the 2 years (have to work 24 months) or are the 2 months via agency taken into consideration?
Taa all
0
Comments
-
Your two years I believe start from the time you work directly for the company. As before that you are working for the agency, not the client.xapprenticex wrote: »Ill keep it short,
If you (And I mean 'I') start at a company via agency for 2 months then taken on by the company directly (permanently, as it were), does that reset the time to make the 2 years (have to work 24 months) or are the 2 months via agency taken into consideration?
Taa allDon't trust a forum for advice. Get proper paid advice. Any advice given should always be checked0 -
Takeaway_Addict wrote: »Your two years I believe start from the time you work directly for the company. As before that you are working for the agency, not the client.
makes sense to me, thanks for that m8. :money:0 -
I do not know the answer, but I seem to recall reading something where someone was working part of the year at a company every year for a few years (lets say 5) and it was treated like they had been there for 5 years continuous.
It was a holiday camp like Butlins or something I think.
It may be worth checking with a professional employment solicitor/HR company.I am a Mortgage AdviserYou should note that this site doesn't check my status as a mortgage adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.0 -
There are several such precedents. But they do not apply. The OP was clearly an agency worker with an established and transparent form of employment, and then later transferred to work directly for the company. Their continuous service dates from that latter time. The percents you are thinking of are based on continuous employment with a single employer and contrived fixed term employment designed to break continuous service.I do not know the answer, but I seem to recall reading something where someone was working part of the year at a company every year for a few years (lets say 5) and it was treated like they had been there for 5 years continuous.
It was a holiday camp like Butlins or something I think.
It may be worth checking with a professional employment solicitor/HR company.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards