We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Ideas for good Personal Pension Provider?

Hi,

I'm 31 and have only just started paying into a pension through my new job. I'm paying the maximum I can into this scheme (to get the highest company contributions), but realising I'm a seriously late starter with pensions I want to invest in another personal pension scheme on top of this. I have £100 a month to invest for the time being and am wondering if anyone can give me a few ideas about who the good providers are and what type of funds I should look at within the wrapper.

Any ideas are gratefully recieved.

Brownie

Comments

  • EdInvestor
    EdInvestor Posts: 15,749 Forumite
    If ou are a basic rate taxpayer, you would be better to save the additional money via a stocks and shares ISA than in a pension.

    It's sensible to open one through a discount broker which rebates charges such as
    https://www.h-l.co.uk
    Trying to keep it simple...;)
  • Ed. You keep on doing this (pedalling opinion as fact)

    There are pros and cons to pensions and isas even for basic rate tax payers which have been dicussed at length in this forum asnd you cannot give a one size fits all to everyone.

    ISAs benefit from access before retirement, tax free growth for the forseeable future and total flexibilty of how they are used in retirmement.

    Pensions benefit from tax relief giving a higher fund at retirement normally even after tax is taken (since 25% is tax free).

    Pensions are not accesisble in the mean time (could be a good thing for many in this spend thrift society or even foir senbsible people who may face the emotional dilema of a needy partner or relative) Unlike ISAs they are protected from creditors and inheitance tax.

    In return for the tax adantages most of a pension pot (75%) must be used restrictively to generate an income.

    In assessing how pensions work for various tax levels, you forget that salary sacrifice can greatly alter the situation in favour of pensions.

    To the questioner: For the sake of picking a provider that does both a good pension and entry level personal pension with lots of funds: Scottish Widows are quite good in my oppinion. My advice would be to see an IFA who is preapred to give you an inital meeting free of charge to give you some more insight at this point in time.
  • EdInvestor
    EdInvestor Posts: 15,749 Forumite
    Ed. You keep on doing this (pedalling opinion as fact)


    Not just my view - it's a broadly held one, as seen on the

    Pensions vs Isas thread


    The general theory is

    +If free money is on offer from a company pension, then join
    +If a higher rate taxpayer, then using a pension to reduce your salary to basic rate may be worth it
    +If a basic rate taxpayer with a very small state pension, it may be worth taking out a small personal pension to use up the 10k age tax free allowance

    Otherwise an investment ISA would be the wrapper of choice.

    It's surprising how many people invest in pensions without knowing that

    +the tax relief they receive upfront has to be paid back in retirement
    +They can never get their money out of the pension (other than 25% when they retire - the rest of the capital is lost to the insurance company)
    +There are strict limits on the amount of income that can be taken out of the pension after they retire

    None of these restrictions apply to an investment ISA.
    Trying to keep it simple...;)
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 121,201 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Not just my view - it's a broadly held one, as seen on the
    The ISA vs pension thread qualifies the comments with the pros and cons.

    A single line of "If ou are a basic rate taxpayer, you would be better to save the additional money via a stocks and shares ISA than in a pension." does not qualify the pros and cons and makes it sound like fact.
    +the tax relief they receive upfront has to be paid back in retirement

    Wrong.

    +They can never get their money out of the pension (other than 25% when they retire - the rest of the capital is lost to the insurance company)

    Wrong.
    +There are strict limits on the amount of income that can be taken out of the pension after they retire

    Not really an issue as the limits are based on what is achieavable on gilts. Rates which are generally on par with savings accounts and sensible to provide a lifetime of guaranateed income.
    None of these restrictions apply to an investment ISA.

    But then the ISA wouldnt pay as much income as a pension and income is what the pension is for.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.