We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
"Broadly Comparable"
Options

Ghostgirll
Posts: 18 Forumite
Can anyone tell me what actually constitutes "broadly comparable" in terms of a pension fund?
When I TUPE'd from one company to another I was promised in writing that the new company's final salary pension scheme would be "broadly comparable" with the (pretty much gold standard) one I'd had with the old company.
Thanks
When I TUPE'd from one company to another I was promised in writing that the new company's final salary pension scheme would be "broadly comparable" with the (pretty much gold standard) one I'd had with the old company.
Thanks
0
Comments
-
Broadly comparable is not defined in TUPE law and means just what it means in layman's terms.
If something is broadly comparable with another, it means that broadly it has similar characteristics to the other. They share enough characteristics for you to be able to say they are attempting to do roughly the same thing, even if they go about it in a different way.
Comparable does not mean identical, and it could have lots of little practical differences, but at least you could easily compare the two in the different areas and get to a similar result overall - without finding that half of the foundations on which Scheme 1 is based is completely missing in Scheme 2. The 'broadly' bit adds further vagueness and reinforces the fact that comparable does not mean the exact same.
One tenet of TUPE is that the new employer may not (unless the contract of employment so provides) unilaterally worsen the terms and conditions of employment of any transferred employee. If you sign up for a change, it's fine, but if they say you must accept worse T&C's to keep your job, you can quit and claim unfair dismissal. If you stop earning benefits under a pension scheme because you leave an employer and now have a new employer, but you still have access to a pension scheme and those schemes are broadly comparable, it doesn't seem like they have worsened your deal.
Of course, if some of the 'gold plate' has been scraped off your pension for new accrual going forwards in a specific area that you really value, ask for more salary or some other benefits instead.
There is a specific 'pensions' bit in TUPE: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2006/246/contents/made0 -
I don't think that's a term with any legal definition. So I would interpret it as there are differences, but no significant ones and yiu won't be worse off. Do you have tge information to compare?Don't listen to me, I'm no expert!0
-
an anyone tell me what actually constitutes "broadly comparable" in terms of a pension fund?
There is no legal definition. It is a term that I have used before and one you see often when something is broadly comparable but not like for like. A difference which is unlikely to be big enough to really matter.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards