We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Changing from monthly to fortnightly pay and losing money

2»

Comments

  • getmore4less
    getmore4less Posts: 46,882 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper I've helped Parliament
    edited 12 September 2016 at 2:31PM
    change your budgeting to annual far better than monthly and do a cash flow analysis to see where the low high points are and adjust bills spending if the low goes negative.

    No one really has all there spends/payments monthly anyway.

    Some bills will be monthly but the rest of the cycles tend to be weekly(day to day shopping) or annual(eg insurance)


    another good cash flow adjuster is a CC paid off in full or if you can get one a 0% card where you can smooth the cashflow over a much longer period.

    the biggest complaint you here from people going from weekly to monthly is 4 month a year have 5 weekends how am I supposed to budget for that.
  • chrisw99 wrote: »
    We are effectively losing a weeks pay in October as we move to being paid 1 week in arrears. We will only get it back when we leave or retire, which could be in another 20 years time.

    No. You get that week's pay in November. Then in March you get six weeks' pay, and it starts again. A week in hand or arrears doesn't mean you get it when you leave - it means you get it after you've worked it.
    I consider myself to be a male feminist. Is that allowed?
  • paddyrg
    paddyrg Posts: 13,543 Forumite
    No. You get that week's pay in November. Then in March you get six weeks' pay, and it starts again. A week in hand or arrears doesn't mean you get it when you leave - it means you get it after you've worked it.

    I think they are worried about it being a rolling week in arrears, ie their last week of work is paid a week later.

    Fact is, this is really very, very normal stuff, and not worth panicking over. And if we're talking a salary of £36-48k, maybe this can be your wake-up call to tighten your belts until you have maybe a £3-5k buffer, or you're always going to be vulnerable to an unexpected cost or cash flow disruption.
  • theoretica
    theoretica Posts: 12,691 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    While you have less money coming into your bank account in November, it will also be coming in earlier in the month on average, which should be useful for an overdraft.

    Some bills will change to fortnightly if you ask, which might be helpful too.
    But a banker, engaged at enormous expense,
    Had the whole of their cash in his care.
    Lewis Carroll
  • sangie595
    sangie595 Posts: 6,092 Forumite
    Th, I would be more concerned about "why" anyway! For most people the big issue is moving to monthly pay, not from it. And one of the reasons employers move to monthly is because it is easier and cheaper to process. Why would an employer move to something that is more expensive to process? The only good reason I can think of is cash flow. And that would be a worrying reason!
  • Doshwaster
    Doshwaster Posts: 6,353 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    sangie595 wrote: »
    Th, I would be more concerned about "why" anyway! For most people the big issue is moving to monthly pay, not from it. And one of the reasons employers move to monthly is because it is easier and cheaper to process. Why would an employer move to something that is more expensive to process? The only good reason I can think of is cash flow. And that would be a worrying reason!

    I would be suspicious too. Twice-monthly pay is quite common in the US but very rare here.
  • eamon
    eamon Posts: 2,322 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic
    Apparently its common in Oz as well. But I would be suspicious as well. I get paid 13 times per year and that used to cause me problems with DD's etc until I cottoned on. Didn't go out for 6 months or so until the overdraft vanished and a surplus was in place. To the OP you will adapt.
  • Doshwaster wrote: »
    I would be suspicious too. Twice-monthly pay is quite common in the US but very rare here.

    We are a US company, something like 30,000 employees over there but only 5000 here, and another 60000 worldwide. They want everybody on the same payroll system.
  • sangie595
    sangie595 Posts: 6,092 Forumite
    chrisw99 wrote: »
    We are a US company, something like 30,000 employees over there but only 5000 here, and another 60000 worldwide. They want everybody on the same payroll system.

    Fair enough. But look at it this way. They can afford to place 5,000 staff anywhere else in the world and have less problems with tight employment legislation. So they aren't going to change for a few UK employees.
  • You should also consider that by being paid every 14 days, you'll get paid an extra day when it's a leap year. For those paid 1/12 of annual salary per month there is no extra allowance when there's an additional working day in the year. You'll be better off!
    One half of the world cannot understand the pleasures of the other
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.