We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
AJ BELL Revised charges from October
Comments
-
"One of the main attractions of AJ Bell Youinvest is our approach to transparent, fair and simple charges that caters for people at all stages of their investment journey."
If AJ Bell want to raise their charges, then that's up to them and it's up to us as customers to decide if we want to stay with them. However, I wish they would be honest and not try to convince us it's a good thing. If they wanted to be transparent then they could have explicitly stated that the cap on fund charges will be removed and so anyone with sizeable fund holdings will see a very large increase in charges. Also, the new charging structure is more complex than the current one - so much for "simple charges".
Bottom line - if you invest significant amounts in OEICS/unit trusts then you will pay more, potentially a lot more. On the other hand, if you use ETFs / Investment trusts then your total charges will be capped at £100 per year + dealing charges which is a good deal.0 -
Currently have approx. £200,000 invested in Invesco Perpetual Monthly income Plus. Is there an equivalent ETF or Investment Trust I can switch too?0
-
-
As IP Monthly Income Plus is a managed global bond fund it would be totally inappropriate to switch to either of those global equities trackers whose range of returns would be very different.ex-pat_scot wrote: »
Government and corporate high yield BONDS can perform very differently to EQUITIES.
Personally I'm not a fan of investing in high yield bonds via tracker ETFs. High yield bonds, which can include what are sometimes called 'junk' bonds due to being non-investment grade, are something I would prefer to be actively selected rather than take all the dross in the index weighted by its size.0 -
ex-pat_scot wrote: »Vanguard would be the starting point.
VWRL ETF is a world tracker, paying quarterly divis
VHYL ETF is a world high yield portfolio.
Really? IP Monthly income has a yield of 5.5% which is presumably why the OP invested in that fund. If you want income you are generally better off in managed funds in my opinion.0 -
I was worried by this change (increase) but having actually read the details I can live with it as I only use youinvest for IT holdings (current only ISAs but will be dealing account as well) it is £7.50 per quarter.
If you have both an ISA and a dealing account do you pay one £7.50 per quarter or two? HL have their charging caps applied separately dont they? Will youinvest?0 -
Currently have approx. £200,000 invested in Invesco Perpetual Monthly income Plus. Is there an equivalent ETF or Investment Trust I can switch too?
If you've already done your research and this is your preferred fund but AJ Bell's price changes have made it too expensive to hold on their platform, then change platform not fund.
I have a portfolio with an asset allocation and holdings (funds, ETFs and ITs) that I have researched and am happy with. I am not prepared to compromise on my choices because of a change in charging structure and so I will be moving platforms.0 -
greenglide wrote: »I was worried by this change (increase) but having actually read the details I can live with it as I only use youinvest for IT holdings (current only ISAs but will be dealing account as well) it is £7.50 per quarter.
If you have both an ISA and a dealing account do you pay one £7.50 per quarter or two? HL have their charging caps applied separately dont they? Will youinvest?
The current charging cap on funds is applied per account (i.e. separately) and so I assume that will continue to be the case with the new charging cap for ITs, ETFs and shares.0 -
Response from YouInvest to my complaints re new SIPP charges :
"We have not taken this decision to change our charges lightly and know that this will affect customers. We believe that these charges are very fair as we have the right to change charges when we believe there has been cross account subsidies (SIPP customers have been offsetting ISA and Dealing Account customers). We have therefore attempted to even out the charging structure. The new fees levied on ISAs and Dealing Accounts are also capped at £30 per annum which is extremely competitive"
.0 -
Interesting response. I wonder if you can use their "SIPP customers have been offsetting ISA and Dealing Account customers" in a complaint against them for raising SIPP fees.
0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards