We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
What taxes on other people would you support?
Options
Comments
-
^Add people using "basically" for no reason and the incorrect use of "your" and "you're".0
-
The problem with this is NIC is a tax (insurance) related to specific things, such as unemployment. Why should retired people pay to insure against being unemployed?
No it's not really. All the money goes into the same "pot". NIC receipts aren't ring-fenced to pay for specific things like the state pension, sick pay, unemployment benefits, NHS etc. People still get the state pension, access to NHS and some other benefits even if they've never paid a penny in NIC. Pensioners may not need insurance against unemployment, but they still benefit from the state pension and the NHS, carer's allowance, disability benefits, care home costs etc. Class 4 self employed NIC doesn't accrue any benefits at all - it's just a tax, pure and simple!0 -
westernpromise wrote: »I would put a tax on people pronouncing H as "haitch", on people who say "could of" instead of "could have",People using abherrant apostrophes.
People using "there", "their" and "they're" incorrectly.
People who say "pacifically" instead of "specifically".
People who use the word "literally" as means of emphasis.Norman_Castle wrote: »Add people using "basically" for no reason and the incorrect use of "your" and "you're".
I think we're on to a winner here. Could raise a mint ...0 -
Norman_Castle wrote: »^Add people using "basically" for no reason and the incorrect use of "your" and "you're".
And then add "for free". It's used so frequently, including by the BBC, that I doubt most realise it's incorrect.0 -
And then add "for free". It's used so frequently, including by the BBC, that I doubt most realise it's incorrect.
And "comedic".
Noun: tragedy = adjective: tragic
Noun: comedy = adjective: comic.
It is tragedic that this error persists.
And "commentate". One who comments is a commentator. A commentator comments. He does not commentate. If he does, then a commentator should be called a commentatator, and he would commentatate, making him a commentatatator.
And "fortuitous". Tiger Woods was not fortuitous with that putt. He was fortunate that quite fortuitously, the ball stopped in a place that made for an easy putt.0 -
-
It has come to my attention that some manufacturers of diesel cars have been fiddling emissions data and particulates associated with diesel may not have been risk assessed appropriately. It's absolutely a moral imperative that, for our children's sake, taxes are dramatically increased on diesel fuel and reduced for petrol.
It's entirely co-incidental that I'll shortly be swapping my diesel car for a petrol version.0 -
Norman_Castle wrote: »^Add people using "basically" for no reason and the incorrect use of "your" and "you're".
And most of all, people who say "I can't" when they obviously mean "I won't".There is no honour to be had in not knowing a thing that can be known - Danny Baker0 -
We could have a grammar Nazi tax ! Then we can add a fine list to the above.
People using abherrant apostrophes.
People using "there", "their" and "they're" incorrectly.
People who say "pacifically" instead of "specifically".
People who use the word "literally" as means of emphasis.
Misuse of 'effect' and 'affect' drives me crazy…
Also 'practice' (noun) and 'practise' (verb) in British English.
Also 'your' and 'you're' (or has someone already mentioned this?)
Also unnecessary hyphenation where meaning is clear without hyphens, and incorrect use of hyphens and en dashes.0 -
westernpromise wrote: »I would put a tax on people pronouncing H as "haitch", on people who say "could of" instead of "could have", and on women who do their makeup on the Tube.
I'd also tax those who eat vile-smelling food on public transport – probably all food smells horrible under such circumstances, unless you are eating it.
I'd tax those who leave food bags and drinks cans lying around on public transport.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards