We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Remortgage Advice Needed Please!
Comments
-
I don't know what more I can say Subbuteo?
If you owe £225,000 for a year on a 4.79% interest rate, the interest is £225,000 X 4.79% £10,777
If you owe £225,000 for a year on a 3.05% interest rate, the interest is £225,000 X 4.79% £6,862 (£3,915 less).
As you will pay some capital off during the year the figures are slightly different to that - but the difference is minor.
If you want to make a saving you could take a 2.35% rate and save £5,489 in interest per year, moving to fixed if rates start to rise?
I fear however, the whole thing may be academic because when lenders value for re-mortgage purposes the valuation figures you get back are conservative and you may not be able to access 90% rates without putting in some cash.I am a Mortgage Broker
You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Broker, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.0 -
I'm not trying to be deliberately difficult, honest!
But it sounds as if you're answering the question 'is it cheaper to have a mortgage at 4.79% or 3.05%' when my question is actually more complex, unless I'm missing something.
What you're saying (if I haven't missed something) is based on the assumption that a person can freely choose between the two products, whereas to work out if it's viable for me to exit a mortgage early, the effects of the cash savings and outflows (reduced payments vs ERC and new product fees) must surely have to be considered, not just the question of whether or not less interest is chargeable? In 12 months I'm free to remortgage without penalty, so surely to decide whether or not it's a good idea for me to incur costs now to terminate before that point, you must consider the net cash position over the next year?
With regards the valuation, I was told by my current lender today that if I were to remortgage with them, my LTV would be 89. something % as they are currently valuing my property at £251k (paid £240k last May).
They say they use the average of the Nationwide and Halifax house price index to calculate the valuation for existing customers who remortgage - not sure if that's standard practice or just this particular lender.0 -
Thanks Phil. It's a 34 year term and £225k mortgage required. The £1k fee (with free legals and val) seems about as good as it'll get!
If a valuation is required are you certain of being beneath 90% LTV?
You would save money by making the switch.
If you are concerned for the future then making overpayments is the way to reduce your exposure and reduce the long term cost. As even at 3.05% you are still looking at £137k of interest over the remaining term of the mortgage. Where interest rates to rise then so would the cost.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.2K Spending & Discounts
- 246.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.2K Life & Family
- 260.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
