We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Postal Votes?

StevieJ
Posts: 20,174 Forumite


I must say I was disturbed to see the level of postal votes in this referendum, something like 25% of the actual voting population. That would be around 9-10 million. I thought postal voting was a fringe activity. It doesn't take much to imagine how this could be corrupted i.e. parties aranging and filling in the vote for old people. Please tell me there are some proper safeguards and controls on this. This was not confined to this referendum the postal votes were also very high for the Scottish referendum and the GE.
'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher
0
Comments
-
I must say I was disturbed to see the level of postal votes in this referendum, something like 25% of the actual voting population. That would be around 9-10 million. I thought postal voting was a fringe activity. It doesn't take much to imagine how this could be corrupted i.e. parties aranging and filling in the vote for old people....
You don't need to imagine anything. It has already happened.... Please tell me there are some proper safeguards and controls on this. This was not confined to this referendum the postal votes were also very high for the Scottish referendum and the GE.
Sadly, postal voting fraud is actually quite easy.0 -
I must say I was disturbed to see the level of postal votes in this referendum, something like 25% of the actual voting population. That would be around 9-10 million. I thought postal voting was a fringe activity. It doesn't take much to imagine how this could be corrupted i.e. parties aranging and filling in the vote for old people. Please tell me there are some proper safeguards and controls on this. This was not confined to this referendum the postal votes were also very high for the Scottish referendum and the GE.
I can't see that this vote was crooked.
Remain might have won if it was sunny but we'll never know. I can think of no reason to suspect that it was anything other than straight. Ms Cox wasn't murdered to try to sway the vote and there was no need to take a pen with you to vote yesterday.
Remain lost and it's important to move on from there. My feeling is that a super majority should be required for a constitutional change but it's too late for that.0 -
I can't see that this vote was crooked.
....
Well yes, it's one thing to fiddle a few local council election results; you probably only need a few hundred dodgy postal votes to fix the result. But in a nationwide referendum you're need a few million dodgy postal votes in order to fix the result.0 -
yeah, I dunno.
I certainly wondered what proportion of alzheimers patients [there are the thick end of a million of these in the UK] 'voted', and how many of these by postal votes that were in practice completed by spouses or babyboomer offspring. I rather suspect that an exceptionally high proportion of all patients who are fully or partly cared for by a relative did indeed cast a vote.
Anecdotally I know one [yes, 1] such 'voter' in her late 80s who retained strong enough views on the single market issue to vote 'leave' despite her having long since lost the ability to recognize any of her family including her husband of 60-odd years. as I understand it her beliefs have recently straddled two or three of the relatively conservative 21st century heterodox schools of economic thought.FACT.0 -
I can't see that this vote was crooked.
Remain might have won if it was sunny but we'll never know.
.
It was sunny all day here and they lost 54/46.
So we do knowThis is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com0 -
Remain lost and it's important to move on from there. My feeling is that a super majority should be required for a constitutional change but it's too late for that.
Problem with that though is that a decison not to vote becomes a vote for the status quo so we could have 100% of votes cast for an option but if only 49.9% of the electorate voted it would be classed as not carried.
Perhaps we need a better constitution altogether? What do other countries do with regard to referenda validity? I seem to remember the dutch require 30% of elegible voters?I think....0 -
We were out of the country for the 2010 election so for the first time had postal votes and have ever since, for the PCC vote in May I received a letter a month later to tell me my vote hadn't been counted as I hadn't fully completed my D.O.B.,I have 100% faith in them.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards