Why POPLA witness statements are worthless. UKPC lose in court

beamerguy

Why POPLA witness statements are worthless. UKPC lose in court

Amongst other points .... FAKE PHOTOGRAPHS

Will the BPA and the DVLA sanction UKPC and ban them to protect the motorist from this ongoing scam

http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2016/06/why-popla-witness-staements-are.html

peter_the_piper

Why are they still in business when they patently lie and issue fraudulent documents. Any other business would be closed down.

Castle

I wonder if the RK's of the other two cars also got tickets for being parked for 22 hours?

beamerguy

peter_the_piper wrote: »

Why are they still in business when they patently lie and issue fraudulent documents. Any other business would be closed down.

And that is a question to be answered by the BPA and the DVLA

pappa_golf

peter_the_piper wrote: »

Why are they still in business when they patently lie and issue fraudulent documents. Any other business would be closed down.

answer:
lying is standard for PPCs , and they pay the BPA lots of money every year for "protection"

Ralph-y

this must be put to the DVLA ......

UKPC suspension again ?

I hope so.......

Ralph:cool:

TDA

Are there actually fake photographs though? The Prankster admits that the defendant conceded that they were "the driver, had parked, had seen the signs, and had breached the terms".

The evidence sounds very circumstantial, based on the presence of some vehicles one day later (particularly considering D admits to multiple breaches). What type of site is it? Are there likely to be staff vehicles which often park in the same locations day after day for example?

All are a bit too quick to jump on this one methinks.

Umkomaas

TDA wrote: »

Are there actually fake photographs though? The Prankster admits that the defendant conceded that they were "the driver, had parked, had seen the signs, and had breached the terms".

The evidence sounds very circumstantial, based on the presence of some vehicles one day later (particularly considering D admits to multiple breaches). What type of site is it? Are there likely to be staff vehicles which often park in the same locations day after day for example?

All are a bit too quick to jump on this one methinks.

Agreed. I'm afraid the opening post set hares unnecessarily running.

Amongst other points .... FAKE PHOTOGRAPHS

Seems the Judge didn't get overly excited on this point, so would be somewhat of a difficult point to pursue, in my view.