We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Remortgage with wife additional SDLT payable?

see900
Posts: 2 Newbie
Hi,
I would value some advice regarding the following scenario if possible.
My current mortgage deal on my main residence is coming to an end and I have decided to remortgage with my now wife (there will be a transfer of equity) ie mortgage changing from single to joint names. I also own another buy to let property in my name only. The outstanding mortgage stands at £175k and I have been informed that the additional 3% SDLT may be payable on half of the mortgage amount. Does this sound correct, despite not purchasing another property, simply a remortgage on my main residence? Is there a way around this eg tenants in common with unequal shares to reduce the liability? Any advice gratefully received, thanks in advance!
I would value some advice regarding the following scenario if possible.
My current mortgage deal on my main residence is coming to an end and I have decided to remortgage with my now wife (there will be a transfer of equity) ie mortgage changing from single to joint names. I also own another buy to let property in my name only. The outstanding mortgage stands at £175k and I have been informed that the additional 3% SDLT may be payable on half of the mortgage amount. Does this sound correct, despite not purchasing another property, simply a remortgage on my main residence? Is there a way around this eg tenants in common with unequal shares to reduce the liability? Any advice gratefully received, thanks in advance!
0
Comments
-
My understanding is the stamp duty is based on the mortgage share being transferred, in this case £175k/2 so £87.5k, this is less than the stampduty threshold so no duty payable.
As your wife is not named on any other property, she will not be liable for the 3%.I am a mortgage adviser.You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.0 -
My understanding is the stamp duty is based on the mortgage share being transferred, in this case £175k/2 so £87.5k, this is less than the stampduty threshold so no duty payable.
As your wife is not named on any other property, she will not be liable for the 3%.
Nope, because she is linked to the OP they are treated as one unit, therefore 3% on half the mortgage. You need to get your mortgage down to £80k before no sdlt applies.0 -
Thank you for you both for your responses.
It would appear that additional SDLT will be payable unfortunately. Can you advise whether then after this is paid, we move, no additional stamp duty will be payable (again)as we are changing our main residence as a single unit (despite myself retaining the existing BTL property)?0 -
Seems strange as you are not increasing the amount of property you own and it is your main residence. I would have thought there wouldn't be any extra SDLT to pay.I'm a Forum Ambassador on the housing, mortgages & student money saving boards. I volunteer to help get your forum questions answered and keep the forum running smoothly. Forum Ambassadors are not moderators and don't read every post. If you spot an illegal or inappropriate post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com (it's not part of my role to deal with this). Any views are mine and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.com.0
-
Glover1862 wrote: »Nope, because she is linked to the OP they are treated as one unit, therefore 3% on half the mortgage. You need to get your mortgage down to £80k before no sdlt applies.
Really? The wife is viewed as also owning the BTL even though it's not in her name?
That would imply that she already owns the main residence too, so no transfer of equity would be needed. However, it is so she doesn't, which would suggest she doesn't already own the BTL either.0 -
Really? The wife is viewed as also owning the BTL even though it's not in her name?
That would imply that she already owns the main residence too, so no transfer of equity would be needed. However, it is so she doesn't, which would suggest she doesn't already own the BTL either.
I agree it's a joke, one minute they see you as "one unit" so additional SDLT applies if you buy another property or added to a mortgage, however, as you rightly say it implies that now you are seen as one unit then surly your wife must already own the property so no transfer of equity, you won't be surprised to know that HMRC don't agree.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards