We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Remortgage with wife additional SDLT payable?

Hi,
I would value some advice regarding the following scenario if possible.
My current mortgage deal on my main residence is coming to an end and I have decided to remortgage with my now wife (there will be a transfer of equity) ie mortgage changing from single to joint names. I also own another buy to let property in my name only. The outstanding mortgage stands at £175k and I have been informed that the additional 3% SDLT may be payable on half of the mortgage amount. Does this sound correct, despite not purchasing another property, simply a remortgage on my main residence? Is there a way around this eg tenants in common with unequal shares to reduce the liability? Any advice gratefully received, thanks in advance!

Comments

  • Wh05apk
    Wh05apk Posts: 2,938 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    My understanding is the stamp duty is based on the mortgage share being transferred, in this case £175k/2 so £87.5k, this is less than the stampduty threshold so no duty payable.


    As your wife is not named on any other property, she will not be liable for the 3%.
    I am a mortgage adviser.
    You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.
  • Glover1862
    Glover1862 Posts: 410 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 100 Posts
    edited 19 May 2016 at 10:19PM
    Wh05apk wrote: »
    My understanding is the stamp duty is based on the mortgage share being transferred, in this case £175k/2 so £87.5k, this is less than the stampduty threshold so no duty payable.


    As your wife is not named on any other property, she will not be liable for the 3%.

    Nope, because she is linked to the OP they are treated as one unit, therefore 3% on half the mortgage. You need to get your mortgage down to £80k before no sdlt applies.
  • see900
    see900 Posts: 2 Newbie
    Thank you for you both for your responses.

    It would appear that additional SDLT will be payable unfortunately. Can you advise whether then after this is paid, we move, no additional stamp duty will be payable (again)as we are changing our main residence as a single unit (despite myself retaining the existing BTL property)?
  • silvercar
    silvercar Posts: 49,791 Ambassador
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Academoney Grad Name Dropper
    Seems strange as you are not increasing the amount of property you own and it is your main residence. I would have thought there wouldn't be any extra SDLT to pay.
    I'm a Forum Ambassador on the housing, mortgages & student money saving boards. I volunteer to help get your forum questions answered and keep the forum running smoothly. Forum Ambassadors are not moderators and don't read every post. If you spot an illegal or inappropriate post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com (it's not part of my role to deal with this). Any views are mine and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.com.
  • ViolaLass
    ViolaLass Posts: 5,764 Forumite
    Glover1862 wrote: »
    Nope, because she is linked to the OP they are treated as one unit, therefore 3% on half the mortgage. You need to get your mortgage down to £80k before no sdlt applies.

    Really? The wife is viewed as also owning the BTL even though it's not in her name?

    That would imply that she already owns the main residence too, so no transfer of equity would be needed. However, it is so she doesn't, which would suggest she doesn't already own the BTL either.
  • Glover1862
    Glover1862 Posts: 410 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 100 Posts
    ViolaLass wrote: »
    Really? The wife is viewed as also owning the BTL even though it's not in her name?

    That would imply that she already owns the main residence too, so no transfer of equity would be needed. However, it is so she doesn't, which would suggest she doesn't already own the BTL either.

    I agree it's a joke, one minute they see you as "one unit" so additional SDLT applies if you buy another property or added to a mortgage, however, as you rightly say it implies that now you are seen as one unit then surly your wife must already own the property so no transfer of equity, you won't be surprised to know that HMRC don't agree.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.