Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

BTL/Second Home Stamp Duty

Just wondering really why the 3% charge was set at £40k rather than closer to £125k. Just in order to raise more tax or another reason?

Comments

  • cells
    cells Posts: 5,246 Forumite
    westv wrote: »
    Just wondering really why the 3% charge was set at £40k rather than closer to £125k. Just in order to raise more tax or another reason?


    below £40k you dont have to declare for stamp duty so they just kept that for everyone rather than complicate it with two sets of rules
  • westv wrote: »
    Just wondering really why the 3% charge was set at £40k rather than closer to £125k. Just in order to raise more tax or another reason?
    It isn't a nil rate band like the 125k on "normal" purchases. It's simply a minimum before its charged. IE, you pay 126k on a normal purchase, you only pay stamp duty on 1k. You pay 41k on a second property, you pay stamp duty on all 41k.


    You can't really compare the two limits, as they do different things.


    The 40k was (imho) so small transactions like the £1 sale in Glasgow doesn't get held up by red tape.
  • PasturesNew
    PasturesNew Posts: 70,698 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    If they'd set it at £125k all the rich bugg4hs would be filling their boots with perfect FTB houses up to the £125k limit .... and it'd cause a sudden rush at everything vaguely 'affordable' so the few people likely to be able to stretch to their first little home before too long would be killed in the rush, swept aside like worthless peasants by those who "obviously worked harder" :)

    It'd create an enormous bubble of excitement and greed among those who already had a home.
  • Conrad
    Conrad Posts: 33,137 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    westv wrote: »


    Just in order to raise more tax or another reason?





    The Gov't owes £1.6 trillion.


    You (we) demand ever more spending - on flood defences, potholes, guide dogs, more midwifes, services for war 'hero's', more on foster kids, the list is endless. I bet you pick up the paper and tut tut when you read there isn't enough being spent on school meals, care for the elderly, cancer, local hospice, carers wages, policing dangerous dogs, on people sleeping rough, on Syrian orphans, etc etc etc. Well that money has to come from somewhere.


    If you want all these entitlements and services and want the debt reduced, tax is probably going to rise.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.