Every Little Interests The Elite

Tinyshoes

purpledonkey wrote: »

So did she :eek:

I am slow. :rotfl:

Sunshinemummy

purpledonkey wrote: »

SSM the only ones you see are with 'hidden' guns, but are identifiable by little a gold pin on their shirt

Are you winding me up :o:o:o

Do they have police uniform on with a gold pin?

Sunshinemummy

purpledonkey wrote: »

So did she :eek:

I think she did more than click!

:D:D:D

TrulyMadly

purpledonkey wrote: »

SSM the only ones you see are with 'hidden' guns, but are identifiable by little a gold pin on their shirt

So they also work in McDonalds?:think:

purpledonkey

Sunshinemummy wrote: »

Are you winding me up :o:o:o

Do they have police uniform on with a gold pin?

Actually not a wind up, believe it or not!

Savvybuyer

matty17r wrote: »

Thanks vanillatwist for all the florida tips - keep them coming please! Our local Mr. T is very naughty with lots of the meat prices today. Prices on packs are not matching the SEL labels. Nothing in our favour though but might be worth checking your local. I don't know how they get away with such dodgy things. Went in with a trolley came out with a bit of ham rtc at 42p still no cond spends.

Completely at random and not related to meat at all, I think M is very naughty if the price indications in both stores in question are correct. It's the Bassett's Jelly Babies carton (460g) that was 50p RTC (totally OOS) in one store only last week. I don't have any stock at all in any M today, so I'm unable to confirm the actual price. However, in one store for me now it is £2 until 17th July according to the label. It has a crossed out price of £2.72. I do not know how it goes from being 50p at the end of last week, to being, allegedly, £2.72 for what can only be three days at maximum before being £2 now.

However, I did have incorrect SELs last time, early this year: one store had £1.50 offer label but they were then 75p - this was before, allegedly, they then went to 50p for about a day before being £1.98 (that was checked at the till) or something higher! Unless they have now had them at 50p in one store but kept them at £2.72 in the other store that is now £2 until 17/7 but currently OOS. In any event of course there is no indication that you could have got them from another M at only 50p! I just don't know how they go - albeit in a different store (and indeed that's probably the answer) - from 50p to was £2.72 and now £2. I would say you never see "was 50p now £2"; however that's not true, as they did once - I assume in error - have an offer label of crossed out 88p (or something like that) and £1 as the new price. That label, which was, to my knowledge, a truthful label was soon changed to a still truthful (as to its then current price but not revealing past price) straight £1 label. Moved from the 'full' truth to the truth as far as it goes:rotfl:. If they are fully truthful (as to the fact that's something's gone up), I therefore assume it's an error on their part:rotfl::rotfl:.

Must be erroneous in this world for people to tell the full truth:D:rotfl::p. (I would now never expect them to! But what low expectations this means I have now sunk to:( - and is therefore not a praise of society at all but instead expects people to be liars or partial truth-tellers (and therefore the undisclosed half being apt to mislead maybe) rather than people being fully true. People cannot be fully true however, as there are penalties for that in this society, whether social penalties or otherwise. It's true - and you may not like to read this, which is the precise problem, because it is true and your reaction is itself proving my point about how you see and perceive me and is itself a social penalty, even if it is only in your thought, but people can't tell the full truth and that gets penalised in this society, whilst liars often get away and are rewarded - whereas, if full truth was told by a supermarket, for example, which showed its previous price even if the price had now increased, the full truth would get penalised if it means customers go elsewhere because they are told something has gone up in price. So, they can't tell the full truth and I assume it's an error on their part if they do:rotfl:. A social faux pas:D:laugh:. They are not lying in what they say. But... "half a picture...":think:. See Lord Scott, Arms to Iraq inquiry report for details of what he says are the problems with the "half a picture" approach. I'm not saying they are misleading in just indicating the current price, or that £2.72 crossed is necessarily wrong - I don't know how they would defend it and perhaps they can - but I'm just thinking about it.)

Was 50p (in the other store, allegedly, according to the label and probably correct as no stock at all) - now £2:eek::(.

I have no idea what price these cartons currently are. I have no stock anywhere, which does suggest they have been on very good price and sold out. I will assume they are still 50p and that the latest price label, supposedly until 17th July, is now incorrect. Whatever I do will be wrong though:rotfl:.

Anon

Sunshinemummy wrote: »

ooh... watch it on catch up.... John Snow naked.... Well worth an hour of your life!
:T:T:T:T

Apart from that it was a waste of time - there not much else going on

Eewwww ... why would I want to see a naked ex-Channel 4 newsreader :eek:.

Anon

underperky

davemorton wrote: »

Saw a documentry some years ago about ho they could train dogs to smell cancer in people, was utterly amazing and there was discussion about using it as an early warning sign. Guess it was shelved



Or maybe this one?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b0OeM6UUAoI



Seems to have been a cracking year for rhubarb. I have an amazebobs recipe for crumble I might post when I find it and use it again.

Yes Dave I remember it I have had cancer twice at different times with two different dogs

They both knew and wouldn't leave my side

What made me think was this dog isn't mine although I do dog sit a few times but this is the first sleep over with the said dog

So obviously I don't think it is cancer but strange that the dog and only a pup 6 months old ...tried at every opportunity to get my trousers or pjs bottoms nosed up to get at it

Typical male :rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:

purpledonkey

Anon wrote: »

Eewwww ... why would I want to see a naked ex-Channel 4 newsreader :eek:.

Anon

Why wouldn't you, phroooooaw :rotfl:

TrulyMadly

Anon wrote: »

Eewwww ... why would I want to see a naked ex-Channel 4 newsreader :eek:.

Anon

John snow?

His swingometer obviously:)