We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Dealing with LTA excess
Comments
-
Yes. Looking at market history we know a drop is likely fairly soon for a value that looks sufficient in this case but it's never guaranteed.RickyB2000 wrote: »Isn't it about timescales and probability?
If there wasn't likely to be a drop in the market in the timescales you need the money then you would be better crystallising, taking the hit and getting straight back in again. If there was likely to be a drop better waiting for it to happen.
Same here but when people start getting Nobel Prizes for work showing how to time markets on a medium timescale - years rather than days or months - things can get a bit more interesting.RickyB2000 wrote: »I was always told not to try and time the markets.
Yes, doing a bit of crystallising at a time is an option. Quite likely but not certain that in this case that would also cause enough to be done at low market value times to eliminate the LTA bill.0 -
Err...but the charge will increase if the investment goes up. But then you can just wait for the next dip can't you :rotfl:Yes, both are potential outcomes. We just know from the past that it's likely that while on average there will usually be growth, there are dips along the way. While there's no guarantee that a dip will happen in time to be useful it is likely. Not certain but not certain of not paying the charge beats the certainty of paying without waiting.0 -
Exactly. Trying to time the market for crystallisation is no different to trying to time it for investment.RickyB2000 wrote: »Isn't it about timescales and probability?
If there wasn't likely to be a drop in the market in the timescales you need the money then you would be better crystallising, taking the hit and getting straight back in again. If there was likely to be a drop better waiting for it to happen.
I was always told not to try and time the markets.0 -
Wrong. All LTA waiting does is just stay invested until the change happens. While market timing for investing or not has the cost of being out of the market.Exactly. Trying to time the market for crystallisation is no different to trying to time it for investment.
You planning to stop pretending that markets don't go down as well as up any time soon?0 -
You might want to look up the last time you replied "wrong" to me. You quickly ate your words :rotfl:Wrong.
You really don't get it, do you? OK let's use some numbers. You have £1.2M in your SIPP, £200k over the LTA.All LTA waiting does is just stay invested until the change happens. While market timing for investing or not has the cost of being out of the market.
You planning to stop pretending that markets don't go down as well as up any time soon?
What value do you wait for before crystallising?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards