We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
SERPS Opt Back In - Poor Advice?
Comments
-
Phoenix say both Protected and Non-Protected policies have the GAR of 10.93% and have added a terminal bonus to the Protected but not the other although the original policy schedules show both having such a benefit (originally called a Capital Bonus).
I would say that is possibly an error as protected rights required the income to be paid a different way to non-protected rights at the time. I would query that and get it verified in writing.Obviously I do feel very fortunate that I signed up in 1988 just before GAR's were terminated and urge everyone to check their policies if taken out before 1990 as I know of no other legal way to get this sort of return and it should not be given away even if the current pension holder has bad reviews.
The last provider offering a GAR pulled out in 1995.
It would not have been possible for the protected rights to do single life with no escalation when you bought this.The full GAR is subject to taking a single life, no guarantee, no escalation, payable annually in arrears annuity but Phoenix has flexibility and can offer a joint life, 5 year guarantee, payable monthly in advance solution for a reduction to 10% or variations on the theme.
So, either the GAR doesnt apply to the protected rights or it adjusted from the base GAR to reflect the terms the protected rights would have been required to issue the annuity on at that time. With protected rights reclassified as non-protected rights a few years ago, that may not be an issue now. Although it may explain why the returns have been different.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards