We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Budget 2016

1356715

Comments

  • kabayiri
    kabayiri Posts: 22,740 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts
    mwpt wrote: »
    Corbyn's attack feels toothless.

    It's like he has been hit with a machine gun style wave of changes, and is left with taking random pot shots back.

    The tactic of throwing everything bar the kitchen sink is working I think.
  • chucknorris
    chucknorris Posts: 10,795 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 16 March 2016 at 2:12PM
    michaels wrote: »
    Umm - except that it remains unchanged for residential property...

    I missed that bit, are you sure? I am looking online now. You are correct I just replayed it.
    Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop
  • mwpt
    mwpt Posts: 2,502 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary Combo Breaker
    I missed that bit, are you sure? I am looking online now.

    He said "except for residential property". I can only assume this directly means property owned by landlords because OO residential property doesn't attract CGT, right?
  • kabayiri
    kabayiri Posts: 22,740 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts
    Why restrict the lifetime ISA to under 40?

    Is it so that he can raise the age limit in future budgets to respond to public demand?
  • chucknorris
    chucknorris Posts: 10,795 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    mwpt wrote: »
    He said "except for residential property". I can only assume this directly means property owned by landlords because OO residential property doesn't attract CGT, right?

    That is correct
    Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop
  • adonis10
    adonis10 Posts: 1,810 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    No mention of the new stamp duty levy on additional properties?
  • kabayiri
    kabayiri Posts: 22,740 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts
    michaels wrote: »
    Sugar tax - sweet ;)

    ..addressing the obesity issue

    ...the elephant in the room eh? (I wasn't looking at certain Tory MPs when I typed this, honest!)
  • Bluebirdman_of_Alcathays
    Bluebirdman_of_Alcathays Posts: 2,859 Forumite
    edited 16 March 2016 at 2:13PM
    adonis10 wrote: »
    No mention of the new stamp duty levy on additional properties?
    https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/508272/GuidanceNote_Final.pdf

    Grace period extended to 36 months if there is an overlap, and corporates are no longer excluded, but otherwise unchanged (I think)


    Correct link now attached.
  • chucknorris
    chucknorris Posts: 10,795 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 16 March 2016 at 2:35PM

    Interesting! It states:

    This measure reduces from 6 April 2016 the 18% rate of CGT to 10% and the 28% rate of CGT to 20% for chargeable gains, except in relation to chargeable gains accruing on the disposal of residential property (that do not qualify for private residence relief), and carried interest.

    I wonder what that means when you have lived in a property and rented it out, because in that situation you claim a pro-rata private residence relief. A possible loophole, but I'm not overly optimistic.

    From the policy paper:

    https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/changes-to-capital-gains-tax-rates/changes-to-capital-gains-tax-rates

    Disposals of residential property and carried interest will be charged at the same rates as they are currently.

    So I don't think any loophole will exist for properties that have been let, but also been a main residence too.

    I should be happy really because it was tipped form some sources that CGT might be increased, so status quo was what I was hoping for, although for all of about 20 mins I thought that it has been cut.

    Good news about the £20k ISA's though.
    Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.