We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Court summons
Comments
-
You state that Lowell have purchased the debt and that you have lost the paperwork. This appears to imply that all you have is a court claim with no evidence of the debt having been submitted.
If Lowell have bought the debt then they should have provided you with a notice of assignment. That notice needs to be correct.
They should also be able to provide copies of any paperwork - deed of assignment (you are entitled to see it), evidence of the loan agreement, statement of account etc etc.
If they cannot provide it then you have a realistic chance of disputing that this debt exists - it is for them to prove that you owe the money not you to prove that you do not!
Whether a joint & several liability is applicable would depend on what was on that paperwork. If you took out a loan in your name and your partner took out a loan in their name rather than the loans being in a joint name then I would defend the claim accordingly
Personally I think you need to issue a defence denying the debt and requesting an order that they produce some evidence for the claimed debt within say 14 or 28 days, failing which you request that the claim be struck out but as National debtline suggests you should really seek some proper advice as a matter of urgency in order that all available facts and evidence can be considered and incorporated into your response - just saying admit it on the basis of having lost the paperwork is very poor advice in my opinion.0 -
Hi and thanks
It was confusing as I was thinking it was the provident loans and not the loan from another company that provident later took over.
I actually got some great advice from legal beagles and have sent both lowell and their solicitors CPR31.14 and CCA1974 requests demanding proof of the debt and denied the debt in defence to the court until they can prove otherwise.
On legal beagles this seems to be a very common thing for lowell to do when they do not even have the paper work and often can not prove anything so seems like chancers.
I will fight it till proven otherwise.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
