We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Employers vicariously liable for the acts of their employees

Might be a handy reference in cases of "rogue employees" in car parks.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-35696701

Comments

  • trisontana
    trisontana Posts: 9,472 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Equally important is this quote from the Department of Health on this thread:-

    https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/70242236#Comment_70242236

    Saying that the NHS is responsible for the actions of any parking companies they employ.
    What part of "A whop bop-a-lu a whop bam boo" don't you understand?
  • dazster
    dazster Posts: 502 Forumite
    Doesn't make a lot of difference really. Employers were already liable for the actions of their employees when related to their employment, all this does is extend that to employees going off-piste and indulging in private criminality on their employer's time.
  • Umkomaas
    Umkomaas Posts: 43,830 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    A point to drive home to Morrisons in any complaint re ParkingEye.
    Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .

    I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.

    Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.

    Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street
  • dazster wrote: »
    Doesn't make a lot of difference really. Employers were already liable for the actions of their employees when related to their employment, all this does is extend that to employees going off-piste and indulging in private criminality on their employer's time.

    This leaves no doubt that, for example, UKPC are responsible when their employees alter the timestamps on photographs to fraudulently issue parking charges.
    Je suis Charlie
  • dazster
    dazster Posts: 502 Forumite
    This leaves no doubt that, for example, UKPC are responsible when their employees alter the timestamps on photographs to fraudulently issue parking charges.

    There never was any doubt about that.
  • From how I understand things, vicarious liability doesn't count if you step out what's "reasonable" to grossly negligent.
    Illegitimi non carborundum:)
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.