Council tax summons which include costs

Wayne_O_Mac

Just think, if Ed had put this much effort into paying his council tax we wouldn't even be in this situation.

molerat

CIS wrote: »

You quote section (2) but ignore section (5) which outlines what the 'sum outstanding' is - council tax & costs .

Sections cannot be picked out at random without looking at the rest of the regulation, at the least.

Of course you can when it suits your agenda.

Anyway, how can it be deemed "illegal" when the High Court has yet to make a decision on the matter, so far it is just an opinion?

Ed2000

because council are scamming people for around


3 m summonses per year

average scam about £50

£150,000,000 per year

As for "expert opinion" unless someone hear is a tax QC they are not an expert.


I realise I am wasting my time with people who cannot read legisatlion

booksurr

Ed2000 wrote: »

As for "expert opinion" unless someone hear is a tax QC they are not an expert.

I realise I am wasting my time with people who cannot read legisatlion

so far all you have done is react to other people's posts. You have yet to offer any evidence to support your case. All you have done is post the Freeman of the Land nonsense, pick one case at random off the internet (which was irrelevant to the point you tried to make), argue over semantics of a verb and then claim you are an "expert" at reading legislation??? Goodbye, your contribution to money saving is worthless.

Ed2000

booksurr wrote: »

so far all you have done is react to other people's posts. You have yet to offer any evidence to support your case. All you have done is post the Freeman of the Land nonsense, pick one case at random off the internet (which was irrelevant to the point you tried to make), argue over semantics of a verb and then claim you are an "expert" at reading legislation??? Goodbye, your contribution to money saving is worthless.

Freeman of fhe land?

you really cant read legislaton can you, little troll?