Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

the cost vs benefit of work

124»

Comments

  • kabayiri
    kabayiri Posts: 22,740 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts
    michaels wrote: »
    It would be a huge saving though if you could just palm them off until they had got over teenage tantrums and were financially self-sufficient....

    Can't you just register your kids offshore and record all expenditure on them as a loss against your profits (income)? ;)
  • lisyloo
    lisyloo Posts: 30,077 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    kabayiri wrote: »
    It's a good question and I can only offer as I find. It wasn't wealth.

    I think as a society we are in a period of transition.

    Some were in jobs which they thought were "for life", and yet increasingly there are fewer such jobs about.

    That's hard when you have spent your whole career in modest retail banking or working for the Post Office. It's depressing to see someone just give up.

    On the plus side I have worked with a lot of young grads and they seem fully aware that they will have to adapt and change. It may just be transition pains.

    I think it can be harder to adapt when you older but also it's easier to just give up.
    My partner found it very hard to find work in his career but if you are in your 30s or 40s you can't just give up so you have to persist or adapt.
    So I don't doubt your experience but I do think that people may have given up when younger people would have carried on looking.
    I know my FIL gave up straight away and didn't even try.
    He might have been right that mid 50's unskilled was looking bad but he didn't even try.
    I'm not saying there isn't ageism but I am saying that part of the early retirement is self inflicted.
  • ReadingTim
    ReadingTim Posts: 4,085 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    The problem is that what is beneficial for the individual may not be beneficial for society as a whole - "work" has positive externalities, as economists term it. Obviously taxes pay for schools, hospitals, roads etc, which the non-worker wants to use just as much as the worker. If enough people stop working, how will those services be paid for?

    Moreover, who will provide them? Fair enough if you want to jack your job in; but what happens if you happen to work as a Doctor, nurse, etc. Would you be advocating early retirement for anyone who fancies it if you've been left on a hospital trolley in a corridor 'cos there's no spare beds in the wards?

    So if you want to have a system which you can "take out" of, you need people to be putting in. Carting yourself off to a desert island and try fending completely for yourself is the logical extension of your argument, which is no basis for a society, as our primitive ancestors decided.
  • mwpt
    mwpt Posts: 2,502 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary Combo Breaker
    ReadingTim wrote: »
    The problem is that what is beneficial for the individual may not be beneficial for society as a whole - "work" has positive externalities, as economists term it. Obviously taxes pay for schools, hospitals, roads etc, which the non-worker wants to use just as much as the worker. If enough people stop working, how will those services be paid for?

    Moreover, who will provide them? Fair enough if you want to jack your job in; but what happens if you happen to work as a Doctor, nurse, etc. Would you be advocating early retirement for anyone who fancies it if you've been left on a hospital trolley in a corridor 'cos there's no spare beds in the wards?

    So if you want to have a system which you can "take out" of, you need people to be putting in. Carting yourself off to a desert island and try fending completely for yourself is the logical extension of your argument, which is no basis for a society, as our primitive ancestors decided.

    Well, my assumption is that if I've managed to reach financial independence by 50, then along the way I've put more than my fair share into the system, in productivity and in taxes.

    But it depends how long I live after that I guess.
  • andybenw
    andybenw Posts: 212 Forumite
    Those who are retired still pay tax.

    Income tax on pensions and other unearned income. Likely at lower levels but still there.
    VAT.
    Tax on fuel.

    Pretty much the only thing not paying is NI.

    Retirees are still spending. Retirees are freeing uo jobs for others.
  • pelirocco wrote: »
    Unless you are working stupidly long hours , there is no lack of hours to do cleaning , personal finance etc . I really wonder how you would have managed in the good old days of working long hard hours in dangerous jobs with no holidays and zero employment protection , no free health cover etc etc etc

    Im normally away from home 2-4 nights a week and am a single parent
    Left is never right but I always am.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.