Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Telegraph, LLs losing money each month in ten out of 11 British regions

2

Comments

  • I've been a LL in the past and escaped last year. I wouldn't go back in with all the negative changes that have been made - far better places to put money than tying it up in a proprty.
    Thinking critically since 1996....
  • chucknorris
    chucknorris Posts: 10,793 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I've been a LL in the past and escaped last year. I wouldn't go back in with all the negative changes that have been made - far better places to put money than tying it up in a proprty.

    When the base rate gets to about 2.5%, it will be profit neutral for me between property and shares (ignoring any capital growth of either asset), and that is distorted by the fact that the equity that would be invested in shares would be reduced by a significant CGT bill. If I didn't have low margin trackers, I would probably be very close to that profit neutrality right now, as my tracker mortgages are only averaging 0.5% over the base rate.
    Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop
  • Generali
    Generali Posts: 36,411 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    cells wrote: »
    depends on the market invested in

    stoke-on-trent is cheaper now in real terms than it was 20 years ago even 25 years ago.

    whereas on the other extreme inner London has done very well over the last 20 years

    True although it is also fair to say that inner London has yields waaay lower than Northern Hell Holes.

    If you can invest over the past 20 years then good on you. Most of us try to invest for the next 20 which is harder to do.
  • chucknorris
    chucknorris Posts: 10,793 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Generali wrote: »
    True although it is also fair to say that inner London has yields waaay lower than Northern Hell Holes.

    If you can invest over the past 20 years then good on you. Most of us try to invest for the next 20 which is harder to do.

    Ahha! So that's why Doctor Who doesn't need to work!
    Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop
  • Generali
    Generali Posts: 36,411 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Ahha! So that's why Doctor Who doesn't need to work!

    Yup.

    He helped the Duke of Westminster buy up west London in c.1067 and pops back now and again to collect the rent.
  • kabayiri
    kabayiri Posts: 22,740 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts
    Generali wrote: »
    True although it is also fair to say that inner London has yields waaay lower than Northern Hell Holes.
    ..

    There is probably still money in niche landlord segments.

    A lot of old seaside B&B type properties in Blackpool have been snapped up in recent years for relatively little money.

    They become HMOs housing social tennants. There is no real appetite to gentrify like we see in London.

    There is a risk of the neighbourhood devaluing I guess, but oddly a friend who lives there tells me about a campaign to get government grants to revive the place!

    State subsidy, kerrching !
  • purch
    purch Posts: 9,865 Forumite
    Generali wrote: »
    I really don't see it as an investment. A business yes, an investment no.

    It's just an income for me.

    There is no way I could have the income I have today, from the amount of my initial capital from any other sourcen with such little risk.

    On the other hand, I still struggle to get my head around how anyone could consider borrowing for a BTL to be anything other than high risk.
    'In nature, there are neither rewards nor punishments - there are Consequences.'
  • purch wrote: »
    On the other hand, I still struggle to get my head around how anyone could consider borrowing for a BTL to be anything other than high risk.

    Tell that to all those new highly leveraged btlers who think property only ever goes up...
  • cells
    cells Posts: 5,246 Forumite
    purch wrote: »
    It's just an income for me.

    There is no way I could have the income I have today, from the amount of my initial capital from any other sourcen with such little risk.

    On the other hand, I still struggle to get my head around how anyone could consider borrowing for a BTL to be anything other than high risk.


    the thing is the local market will determine how successful a historic investor has been.

    lots of (virtually all) landlords just invest in their local area. I kind of did the same but lucky for me my back yard was hackney, right next to the city of london near to westminster and docklands too. Were it stoke on trent.....I would not have had such luck

    generali point was i think, that overall property probably is not a good long term bet. some might say the same for shales, but of course individual shares can massively outperform the market (think apple). London is the apple of the property world yet a lot of people seem to think the whole country or property as an asset class has all performed like london
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    cells wrote: »
    individual shares can massively outperform the market (think apple).

    Took more than bite to be successful.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.