Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

March budget

124»

Comments

  • Tromking
    Tromking Posts: 2,691 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Thrugelmir wrote: »
    Costs money to rid an organisation of inefficient and unproductive workers. Redundancy costs are high in the public sector. (Up to 23 months gross pay is far above what those in the private sector receive). As a consequence the savings will take some years to flow through.

    Unless you're being deliberately provocative, I think the plan was to lower the headcount big time rather than target the people you suggest. In my sphere where experience is pretty much everything, it was somewhat shortsighted to get rid of that group and employ people who only hang around briefly before they get stressed and leave. I`m not sure having to recruit 2300 new staff in 12 months just to make a net gain of 500 is making good use of public money. Being responsible in government isn't just about lowering pension liabilities, it's also about running things properly and making sure we have the first world public services we all like to have.
    “Britain- A friend to all, beholden to none”. 🇬🇧
  • Mistermeaner
    Mistermeaner Posts: 3,024 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    I would prioritise deficit reduction over first world public services. Let the private sector deliver the services.
    Left is never right but I always am.
  • Tromking
    Tromking Posts: 2,691 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    I would prioritise deficit reduction over first world public services. Let the private sector deliver the services.

    I think they've privatised as much they can get away with politically. They're not going to trust the likes of a French catering company with the ambulance service for example.
    “Britain- A friend to all, beholden to none”. 🇬🇧
  • CLAPTON
    CLAPTON Posts: 41,865 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Tromking wrote: »
    Unless you're being deliberately provocative, I think the plan was to lower the headcount big time rather than target the people you suggest. In my sphere where experience is pretty much everything, it was somewhat shortsighted to get rid of that group and employ people who only hang around briefly before they get stressed and leave. I`m not sure having to recruit 2300 new staff in 12 months just to make a net gain of 500 is making good use of public money. Being responsible in government isn't just about lowering pension liabilities, it's also about running things properly and making sure we have the first world public services we all like to have.

    of course that is true

    are you saying the civil servants who are implementing the efficiency savings are incompetent?
  • Tromking wrote: »
    I think they've privatised as much they can get away with politically. They're not going to trust the likes of a French catering company with the ambulance service for example.

    What's wrong with French catering companies?
    Left is never right but I always am.
  • kinger101
    kinger101 Posts: 6,573 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    What's wrong with French catering companies?

    Personally, I wouldn't mind some foie gras on my way to A&E.
    "Real knowledge is to know the extent of one's ignorance" - Confucius
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.