We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Osbourne warns of "Dangerous cocktail" of economic risks

Graham_Devon
Posts: 58,560 Forumite


The UK faces a "cocktail" of serious threats from a slowing global economy as 2016 begins, Chancellor George Osborne will warn.
Mr Osborne will say this year is likely to be one of the toughest since the financial crisis.
He told the BBC that far from "mission accomplished" on the economy, "2016 is the year of mission critical".
His message is in stark contrast to the positive tone of his Autumn Statement, when he said the UK was "growing fast".
On the last sentence, todays statement is nto only a stark contrast, it's wildly different to his Autumn statement.
One of those dangerous risks appears to be consumer credit (all over again). Something which is a bit Catch22 really as it's allowed the government to make statements about how well we are doing.
However, he was keen to point out that the recovery was "not a debt fuelled recovery". However, he stated that complacency appears to be developing.
So it seems hes covered all bases. Warned on everything but claimed that it's not actually an issue right now.
Least they have every base covered should they need to make statements in the future!
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-35249887
0
Comments
-
Oh dear Osborne. Your goto [strike]GDP[/strike] trump card, the housing market, looks like it might have been used already. Can you lower interest rates more, print more, create new HTBdeluxe schemes?0
-
GDP means very little out in the real world......0
-
Thrugelmir wrote: »GDP means very little out in the real world......
I can remove that word from my post and retain the meaning0 -
Gonna miss his public sector borrowing target by £10 billion they reckon. Osborne is over rated.“Britain- A friend to all, beholden to none”. 🇬🇧0
-
Will we forgive him (or the Torys) a second time for missing the deficit target, should it happen come the end of this parliamentary term?
I'm not sure we can.
Even in a challenging global world, there will still be winners and losers. We need to be the winners.0 -
Will we forgive him (or the Torys) a second time for missing the deficit target, should it happen come the end of this parliamentary term?
I'm not sure we can.
Even in a challenging global world, there will still be winners and losers. We need to be the winners.
I don't have facts to back up my opinion but I never imagined he would meet his borrowing targets, neither last term, nor this term. I cannot see how we can get the deficit to zero in five years, never mind begin paying back the debt. Not without more tax rises. Do they even truly want that, shrinking the money supply?
My pure speculation: The UK just has to appear to be prudent, or at least more prudent than the next best thing, so investors don't lose faith in British bonds.0 -
Surely the slowing global economy can be attributed to Gordon Brown?Change is inevitable, except from a vending machine.0
-
How much worse would it have been under labour?
The same people that are criticising the missed targets are the exact same people who criticise every spending cut.Left is never right but I always am.0 -
Mistermeaner wrote: »How much worse would it have been under labour?
Impossible to answer really as we just don't know. All we can do is guess, and bias is going to take over here on all sides.
What we do know though is that labour didn't force these targets on the tories.0 -
Graham_Devon wrote: »Impossible to answer really as we just don't know. All we can do is guess, and bias is going to take over here on all sides.
What we do know though is that labour didn't force these targets on the tories.
And the part of my post you didn't quote?Left is never right but I always am.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards