Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Day 11: 12 days of Xmas

2»

Comments

  • michaels
    michaels Posts: 29,133 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    antrobus wrote: »
    Since you insist.:)

    Avoidance is exploiting the tax rules to gain a tax advantage that Parliament never intended. It often involves contrived, artificial transactions that serve little or no commercial purpose other than to produce a tax advantage. It involves operating within the letter but not the spirit of the law.

    It does not include international tax arrangements like base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS), which will be tackled multilaterally through the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). The OECD defines BEPS as “tax planning strategies that exploit gaps and mismatches in tax rules to make profits disappear for tax purposes or to shift profits to locations where there is little or no real activity but the taxes are low resulting in little or no overall corporate tax being paid”.

    Where we can challenge cross-border tax avoidance or aggressive tax planning under UK law, it is reflected in the tax gaps for avoidance and legal interpretation, but where the effect of such activity is the result not of frustrating UK law but of exploiting the international tax framework, we do not include it in the avoidance tax gap. Tax avoidance is not the same as tax planning. Tax planning involves using tax reliefs for the purpose for which they were intended. For example, claiming tax relief on capital investment, saving in a tax-exempt ISA or saving for retirement by making contributions to a pension scheme are all forms of tax planning.

    Measuring tax gaps 2015 edition
    https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/470540/HMRC-measuring-tax-gaps-2015-1.pdf

    I wonder where pension salary sacrifice to maximise tax credits entitlement falls on the avoidance scale....
    I think....
  • purch
    purch Posts: 9,865 Forumite
    Of course the amount that the UK Government thinks was avoided, and the actual amount avoided could easily be vastly different.
    'In nature, there are neither rewards nor punishments - there are Consequences.'
  • Malthusian
    Malthusian Posts: 11,055 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    The answer is 1.3 trillion pounds.

    Source:

    1) UK GDP was 1,808 billion.

    2) UK tax take was 515 billion.

    3) HMRC belives that all money made in the UK rightfully belongs to itself, and any money left in an individual's pay packet is money that HMRC has graciously given to them. (Hence the increasing use of terms like "allowances" and "tax credits" to describe your own money.) Therefore, the total "tax avoidance" is 2) subtracted from 1). ;-)
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.