Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Another thread on BTL

2

Comments

  • CLAPTON
    CLAPTON Posts: 41,865 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    I'll remind you next time you are moaning about "human rights" or your favourite, EU law, of this very post ;)

    Rule of law is one thing. Doing this when they haven't even found what law it contravenes yet is something else!

    I am in favour of scrapping the human rights act: I'm glad you are coming round to share my view.

    However, I believe the existing laws should be applied without favour to all the people equally whether I like them or not.

    If they can't find a law that has been broken then presumably they will fail at considerable cost to themselves.

    Why are you upset about them throwing their own money away?
  • Graham_Devon
    Graham_Devon Posts: 58,560 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    CLAPTON wrote: »
    I am in favour of scrapping the human rights act: I'm glad you are coming round to share my view.

    I know. You have moaned about it enough - until this thread where it may back up your views that is.

    Just a shame you couldn't see this before jumping straight in with another silly comment.
  • kinger101
    kinger101 Posts: 6,573 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    antrobus wrote: »
    It does seem a bit of stretch to me.

    It may well be a "fundamental financial business principle" that "income less costs equals profit", but it is also a fundamental financial business principle that taxable profits are often calculated by different rules to accounting profits, and that the taxable profits of a property business are calculated on a different basis to other businesses. (It has always been thus, ever since the days of Schedule A).

    Taxable profits are calculated on a different basis to accounting profits, but usually the differences are timing. This isn't taxing profit though. It's taxing turnover.
    "Real knowledge is to know the extent of one's ignorance" - Confucius
  • leveller2911
    leveller2911 Posts: 8,061 Forumite
    edited 24 December 2015 at 5:00PM
    The premise for a challenge is a good one. It is well established in all other areas of public policy regarding business taxation that profit equals income minus costs.
    This is no different than the long established premise that National Insurance contributions contribute to our entitlement to benefits and the State Pension.

    Yet the self employed pay class 2 and 4 but the class 4 NI contributions (9% of any profit over £8k) do not go towards any entitlement to benefits or pension.

    Its a tax pure and simple and Governments will tax where and how they wish so a bunch of whinging landlords won't change it..

    Ain't life a b*tch..
  • CLAPTON
    CLAPTON Posts: 41,865 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    I know. You have moaned about it enough - until this thread where it may back up your views that is.

    Just a shame you couldn't see this before jumping straight in with another silly comment.

    no comment on the rule of (existing) law being applied to all people without favour?
  • kinger101
    kinger101 Posts: 6,573 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    This is no different than the long established premise that National Insurance contributions contribute to our entitlement to benefits and the State Pension.

    Yet the self employed pay class 2 and 4 but the class 4 NI contributions (9% of any profit over £8k) do not go towards any entitlement to benefits or pension.

    Its a tax pure and simple and Governments will tax where and how they wish so a bunch of whinging landlords won't change it..

    Ain't life a b*tch..

    You'll have to explain yourself. BTW, entitlement to the State Pension does require NI contributions so you're wrong anyway. But your analogy has washed completely over my head.
    "Real knowledge is to know the extent of one's ignorance" - Confucius
  • leveller2911
    leveller2911 Posts: 8,061 Forumite
    edited 24 December 2015 at 5:31PM
    kinger101 wrote: »
    You'll have to explain yourself. BTW, entitlement to the State Pension does require NI contributions so you're wrong anyway. But your analogy has washed completely over my head.
    Hamish posted a premise that tax is based on profit and has been for a long time but the government intended to tax turnover instead which LL believe is unfair.

    My anology was based on the current NI system where we are told our benefit entitlement and pension entitlement was based on our NI contributions when in fact they aren't.Forget Class2 for a moment which do count towards benefit/pension entitlement.

    The self employed pay Class 4 NI at 9% of their profit . This class of NI contributions do not go towards any entitlement so its a tax ,pure and simple.

    My point being NI class 4 are in fact not NI they are a tax , is that "fair"?.

    Hence lifes a b*tch so LL should stop whinging.
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Hamish posted a premise that tax is based on profit and has been for a long time but the government intended to tax turnover instead which LL believe is unfair.

    Not a tax on turnover as there no correlation between income and interest paid.

    Nor is it turnover it's income.
  • CLAPTON
    CLAPTON Posts: 41,865 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Thrugelmir wrote: »
    Not a tax on turnover as there no correlation between income and interest paid.

    Nor is it turnover it's income.

    the exiting system is that you are taxed on the profit which is

    rental income less
    -mortgage interest
    -less wear and tear (if furnished)
    -less other costs (advertising, safety checks repairs)

    the new system will be
    taxed on
    rental income less
    -wear&tear (if furnished by actual spend)
    -less other costs

    plus a tax credit at basic rate if your total income based on the new 'profit' defintion is less than 40% tax level

    so neither a turnover tax nor income only either
  • chucknorris
    chucknorris Posts: 10,793 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    CLAPTON wrote: »
    the exiting system is that you are taxed on the profit which is

    rental income less
    -mortgage interest
    -less wear and tear (if furnished)
    -less other costs (advertising, safety checks repairs)

    the new system will be
    taxed on
    rental income less
    -wear&tear (if furnished by actual spend)
    -less other costs

    plus a tax credit at basic rate if your total income based on the new 'profit' defintion is less than 40% tax level

    so neither a turnover tax nor income only either

    Bit more detail:

    Landlords will be able to obtain relief as follows:

    in 2017 to 2018 the deduction from property income (as is currently allowed) will be restricted to 75% of finance costs, with the remaining 25% being available as a basic rate tax reduction
    in 2018 to 2019, 50% finance costs deduction and 50% given as a basic rate tax reduction
    in 2019 to 2020, 25% finance costs deduction and 75% given as a basic rate tax reduction
    from 2020 to 2021 all financing costs incurred by a landlord will be given as a basic rate tax reduction

    https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/restricting-finance-cost-relief-for-individual-landlords/restricting-finance-cost-relief-for-individual-landlords
    Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.