📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Cycling News

Options
The private-hire driver who nudged the rear of my bicycle twice with the wing of his vehicle whilst I was stationary in a traffic queue last February has recently been found guilty of driving without due care and attention, has had to pay £950 in fines and court costs and received four points on his licence.

would've . . . could've . . . should've . . .


A.A.A.S. (Associate of the Acronym Abolition Society)

There's definitely no 'a' in 'definitely'.

Comments

  • rdr
    rdr Posts: 413 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper
    Was there any intent? If there was, why not assult?
  • bebewoo
    bebewoo Posts: 622 Forumite
    Good for you
  • Throbbe
    Throbbe Posts: 469 Forumite
    Just out of interest, was that assisted by camera footage, or witnesses.


    Happily I've never experienced worse than someone shouting out of a window, but wondered how you'd go about getting the police to follow up something like this.
  • Well done on securing a prosecution. Would be interested to know if it was secured using video evidence? Some police officers / forces have refused to look at video evidence, as mentioned here on the CTC's Road Justice web site:

    http://www.roadjustice.org.uk/video-evidence

    Are there any police officers out there who can explain why?
  • rdr wrote: »
    Was there any intent? If there was, why not assult?

    Because he nudged the bike not the rider. For info you don't need intent for assault.
  • brat
    brat Posts: 2,533 Forumite
    BykerSands wrote: »
    Because he nudged the bike not the rider. For info you don't need intent for assault.

    If there's no intent, if the act was merely reckless, it would almost always be dealt with under road traffic legislation. But your more general point about assault is correct.
    Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler.
  • Teapot55
    Teapot55 Posts: 792 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 24 December 2015 at 1:54AM
    Throbbe wrote: »
    Just out of interest, was that assisted by camera footage, or witnesses.

    I only called the police because two witnesses appeared and urged me to do so. It may have [edit: been] taken to court by the police because the action of the private-hire driver did not come after an altercation between us; indeed I was not even aware of him until his vehicle hit mine, as I was stationary and he was behind me.

    would've . . . could've . . . should've . . .


    A.A.A.S. (Associate of the Acronym Abolition Society)

    There's definitely no 'a' in 'definitely'.
  • Tilt
    Tilt Posts: 3,599 Forumite
    Teapot55 wrote: »
    Throbbe wrote: »
    Just out of interest, was that assisted by camera footage, or witnesses.

    I only called the police because two witnesses appeared and urged me to do so. It may have [edit: been] taken to court by the police because the action of the private-hire driver did not come after an altercation between us; indeed I was not even aware of him until his vehicle hit mine, as I was stationary and he was behind me.

    Strange that the police attended unless details hadn't been exchanged or it was a fail to stop. Plus for the driver to of been charged, i'm assuming you made a compliant against him.
    PLEASE NOTE
    My advice should be used as guidance only. You should always obtain face to face professional advice before taking any action.
  • [Well I have had a bit of a rough year, especially regarding not having time to check the posts on the MSE forums, but finally catching up].

    In answer to your questions, Tilt, I phoned the police on my mobile to inform them of what had just happened - guess that is classed as a complaint. They asked me where the driver was & I said he had gone, which he had. They did not send an officer - it was all handled subsequent to the incident by email between the police & myself.

    would've . . . could've . . . should've . . .


    A.A.A.S. (Associate of the Acronym Abolition Society)

    There's definitely no 'a' in 'definitely'.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.