We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Who should pay for theft?

2»

Comments

  • ohreally
    ohreally Posts: 7,525 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Op, making certain assumptions re contractual clawback, my inclination would be to bring it on and let them convene a disciplinary hearing, I'd have high expectations of a positive outcome.

    Posted from iPhone.
    Don’t be a can’t, be a can.
  • sangie595
    sangie595 Posts: 6,092 Forumite
    ohreally wrote: »
    Op, making certain assumptions re contractual clawback, my inclination would be to bring it on and let them convene a disciplinary hearing, I'd have high expectations of a positive outcome.

    Posted from iPhone.


    I would also let them bring it on. But I am less certain of the outcome because I have a lower expectation of fairness from employers! Anything short of a dismissal cannot be challenged independently. So the OP does need to understand the risk as well as the options.
  • littleboo
    littleboo Posts: 1,875 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Why are they saying your husband is to blame ? Are they saying he was negligent
    in some way ? Does the store have appropriate systems in place to deter and prevent theft ?

    What would the disciplinary case be for - the fact that a theft took place and your husband is somehow to blame, or the fact that your husband was not prepared to make good the loss ?

    As previously mentioned, check the contract of employment and staff handbook
  • pimento
    pimento Posts: 6,243 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    If the item was worth £80 on the shop floor, then your husband (even if he were liable and I would doubt that) should surely only be responsible for the cost price of the item.
    "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." -- Red Adair
  • TELLIT01
    TELLIT01 Posts: 18,610 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper PPI Party Pooper
    Looks suspiciously like the manager trying to cover his own backside. If anybody would be held responsible for the loss (which is unlikely unless negligence can be proved) it's more likely to be the manager than a part time member of staff.
    Your husband needs to call the bluff and say he wants it taken on up the chain as it isn't his responsibility and he isn't going to pay.
  • Retrogamer
    Retrogamer Posts: 4,218 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    In civil law someone is deemed liable if they were negligent but unsure about employment law.

    If he wasn't negligent when the item was stolen i'd be asking them for an explanation to the reasons that they think make him liable then query why these reasons don't apply to the other staff as well.
    All your base are belong to us.
  • gardner1
    gardner1 Posts: 3,154 Forumite
    If it was me......I would refuse to pay and let them try and discipline me (if he's in union all the better)otherwise go down the unfair dismissal route

    they sound like a wonderful company to work for :eek:
  • TBagpuss
    TBagpuss Posts: 11,237 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Is he in a union? Do you have legal cover under any insurances? It would.
    If not, he might find it useful to speak to the ACAS helpline.

    AS I understand it:
    - They cannot make deductions from his pay unless he consents or it is permitted by his contract, and even if they are entitled to deduct, he could ask to pay in instalments so it is manageable
    - Unless there is a specific reason for targeting him - i.e. if they are alleging he was personally negligent, then it might be worth his raising it as a grievance, to challenge the fact that he was singled out, and (if Appropriate) to challenge whether it is a non-contractual deduction.
    All posts are my personal opinion, not formal advice Always get proper, professional advice (particularly about anything legal!)
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.