We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
South East more confident of house price rises than ever recorded

padington
Posts: 3,121 Forumite
Proudly voted remain. A global union of countries is the only way to commit global capital to the rule of law.
0
Comments
-
Hmm, and last time that happened, we had a huge economic crash within a year or so. I'm not suggesting that the same thing will happen now, just pointing out that these kind of bullish pronouncements can have a habit of proving to be somewhat wide of the mark.
For an opposing view, it's worth considering this
http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/markets/article-3327437/Nationwide-s-boss-Graham-Beale-warns-house-prices-London-slam-reverse-describing-market-unsustainable.html
Personally this seems more likely to me, but then I thought something similar last year and was proved wrong so who knows.0 -
Hmm, and last time that happened, we had a huge economic crash within a year or so. I'm not suggesting that the same thing will happen now, just pointing out that these kind of bullish pronouncements can have a habit of proving to be somewhat wide of the mark.
For an opposing view, it's worth considering this
http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/markets/article-3327437/Nationwide-s-boss-Graham-Beale-warns-house-prices-London-slam-reverse-describing-market-unsustainable.html
Personally this seems more likely to me, but then I thought something similar last year and was proved wrong so who knows.
It's clearly unsustainable, but that doesn't mean prices have peaked.
Where I am (prime SE) Three years ago you could buy a three bed semi with garage for £250k A two bed terrace costs more than that now!0 -
"ever recorded" - the index started in 2009.
still...FACT.0 -
I think that's kind of what I was getting at Trev. The kind of rates of increase we have seen in recent years in London simply can't go on forever. There will come a point where the affordability ceiling is hit, and there will simply be nowhere else to go price wise.
Of course, predicting when that point will be is something of a mugs game. I thought that we were probably there last summer, but have been proved very wrong on that score. I can't help thinking that we can't be too far off a top, but I certainly wouldn't want to be betting on being right on that score.0 -
Hmm, and last time that happened, we had a huge economic crash within a year or so. I'm not suggesting that the same thing will happen now, just pointing out that these kind of bullish pronouncements can have a habit of proving to be somewhat wide of the mark.
For an opposing view, it's worth considering this
http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/markets/article-3327437/Nationwide-s-boss-Graham-Beale-warns-house-prices-London-slam-reverse-describing-market-unsustainable.html
Personally this seems more likely to me, but then I thought something similar last year and was proved wrong so who knows.0 -
-
True, it was talking more about prices being close to a top than "slamming into reverse", but that's journalists for you. But even what was said creates a somewhat different view to the Knight Frank document.0
-
There will come a point where the affordability ceiling is hit, and there will simply be nowhere else to go price wise. .
I agree.
But I also think we're many years away from that.
Prices must rise until sufficient numbers of people are priced out so as to effectively ration the limited supply of housing.
But the average Loan to Income ratio today for FTB's is only 3.45 with capital repayment and interest payments taking up just 18.4% of income. For home movers it's just 3.15% and 18.1% of income.
Borrowing remains far lower than it was 7 years ago, we're still only issuing around half the mortgages each year than we were before the credit-crunch, and regulation has placed significant restrictions on the number of higher LTI mortgages that can be issued by banks.“The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.
Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”
-- President John F. Kennedy”0 -
HAMISH_MCTAVISH wrote: »I agree.
But I also think we're many years away from that.
Prices must rise until sufficient numbers of people are priced out so as to effectively ration the limited supply of housing.
But the average Loan to Income ratio today for FTB's is only 3.45 with capital repayment and interest payments taking up just 18.4% of income. For home movers it's just 3.15% and 18.1% of income.
Borrowing remains far lower than it was 7 years ago, we're still only issuing around half the mortgages each year than we were before the credit-crunch, and regulation has placed significant restrictions on the number of higher LTI mortgages that can be issued by banks.
On a nationwide basis I would agree with you, but I think London is a different story altogether, and I think it was telling that the Nationwide CEO described that market "outside London" as "sensible and sustainable" while commenting on the unsustainability of the picture in London. The price to income ratios in the capital are absolutely eye watering, and I think there has to be a question as to how much further that can go.
Like I say, I'm not saying that its going to end tomorrow, but I do think that just as London started rising earlier than the rest of the country, it will hit it's ceiling sooner too. . . . .and that time will (in the greater scheme) come sooner rather than later.0 -
I closed out my long position at the end of last year as I saw the election leading to uncertainty making the market go dead at the start of the year and I expected a Lab minority govt leading to further stasis. So I go tthe first bit OK, things did get very quiet in the spring and for example London took a breather but I was wrong about the election and so wrong about what has happened since. Currently I can't see the supply and demand equation leading to anything other than further rises though I suspect the BoE will try to control funding further via whatever means it has given it can't pull the interest rate lever.I think....0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards