We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Can a person be denied going self employed?

Options
I just read a odd article and wondered can hmrc, or anyone else be deny someone going self employed(aside from a bankrupt person)?
Chances are I'm in this thread asking questions as I love to learn new stuff. (Did you know all polar bears are left handed?)

Comments

  • CLAPTON
    CLAPTON Posts: 41,865 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    keaton wrote: »
    I just read a odd article and wondered can hmrc, or anyone else be deny someone going self employed(aside from a bankrupt person)?

    a bankrupt can be a self employed window cleaner or any of another million types of activities
  • molerat
    molerat Posts: 34,540 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    HMRC can deny that you are self employed in some circumstances but they cannot prevent you from becoming genuinely self employed.
  • WHA
    WHA Posts: 1,359 Forumite
    HMRC can decide that the work you do isn't self employment and charge tax/NIC as if you were an employee, but that doesn't stop you working as self employed - it's just that they charge tax/nic differently on your earnings.
  • I think they can also deny you if the "objective" of you being "self employed" is merely to achieve tax losses by claiming expenditures as tax deductible within the self employment which would otherwise be classed as just normal personal expenditure outside of business which could not be deducted form anything.
    (Annual subs to professional and other regulatory bodies comes to mind)
  • teddysmum
    teddysmum Posts: 9,521 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    I think they can also deny you if the "objective" of you being "self employed" is merely to achieve tax losses by claiming expenditures as tax deductible within the self employment which would otherwise be classed as just normal personal expenditure outside of business which could not be deducted form anything.
    (Annual subs to professional and other regulatory bodies comes to mind)



    I seem to remember a conversation in which it was mentioned that, if a business fails to make a profit, after a reasonable time, it is denied business status.
  • keaton
    keaton Posts: 183 Forumite
    teddysmum wrote: »
    I seem to remember a conversation in which it was mentioned that, if a business fails to make a profit, after a reasonable time, it is denied business status.

    So the self employed person would be forced to become a paye employee?
    Chances are I'm in this thread asking questions as I love to learn new stuff. (Did you know all polar bears are left handed?)
  • CLAPTON
    CLAPTON Posts: 41,865 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    keaton wrote: »
    So the self employed person would be forced to become a paye employee?

    obviously not

    I think (but am unsure) , that there a suggestion that the full range of benefits which SE usually opens, will not apply for SE with very low earning (which can be seen as scams simply to claim benefits)
  • booksurr
    booksurr Posts: 3,700 Forumite
    edited 20 November 2015 at 9:41PM
    keaton wrote: »
    So the self employed person would be forced to become a paye employee?
    teddymun's comment is a sweeping generalisation and you should not take it literally as it is contextless

    since you have not given any context for your initial comment about what you read it is impossible to comment on whether what you read was right or not. There are loads of circumstances where HMRC would challenge self employed status, but that would be related to your tax status of "self" employed as opposed to being an employee (or not working)

    Example 1: it, could be applied to the scenario where HMRC were investigating someone who had previously undertaken a "hobby" and had subsequently claimed it was a "business" and had carried on said "business" for several years claiming losses each year. HMRC would quite rightly challenge that it failed one or more of the "10 badges of trade" (google that phrase as it is very important to understanding tax) as there was no obvious business like behavior, such as intention to make a profit.

    Therefore, the business (ie self employed status) would be "denied" as the taxpayer was simply manipulating the system in order to claim tax relief on expenses associated with their hobby not a real business. In reality HMRC are not "denying" self employment, they are saying that the business does not exist at all, whether the person tries to claim they are an "employee" of it or its "self employed" owner. They are neither, there is no business , its simply their hobby

    Example 2: "false" self employment under IR 35 (google it, it's rather complex and HMRC have little appetite for challenging it of late)
  • Nobody can prevent you being self employed.
    Why would they?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.