We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Why buy – ever?
Comments
-
And right here you've summed up all that is wrong with some of BTL investing. Your statement should be :
"the rental income is consistent and offers a good ROI. After that capital gains are a bonus".
When I bought mine over 24 years ago, I bought them for the future rental profits, and also hoping that there would be a good capital gain when I eventually sold, but as you say, that was perceived as a bonus. Now that I've seen the gains, they have become even more valuable than the rental profit, due to higher values reducing yields, but the capital gain was never the focus.Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop0 -
MatthewAinsworth wrote: »Mwpt - house price inflation is between 5-10% generally and that alone is difficult to reliably beat, I'd like to see what else performs like this,
Houses can't continue to rise at the rate of 5-10% in the long term (in a low inflation environment, like we have), especially from the current all time highs that we have in London. You can't look at the good years in isolation and ignore the bad years.Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop0 -
The living wage in April and tax credits help boost it too. You'd see scarier numbers if wage inflation was 3 or 4%; 15-20% house inflationThis is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com0
-
Chuck - its the mortgage multiplier that does this, makes it 5x whatever wage inflation isThis is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com0
-
MatthewAinsworth wrote: »Chuck - its the mortgage multiplier that does this, makes it 5x whatever wage inflation is
Don't get me wrong, I would welcome such rises, but I just don't see it happening.Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop0 -
MatthewAinsworth wrote: »The living wage in April and tax credits help boost it too. You'd see scarier numbers if wage inflation was 3 or 4%; 15-20% house inflation
But wage inflation is 3%. So why aren't the numbers scarier?0 -
MatthewAinsworth wrote: »Chuck - its the mortgage multiplier that does this, makes it 5x whatever wage inflation is
No, your arithmetic is wrong.
Someone who earns £20,000 a year, can borrow £100,000 if the multiplier is five. If their wage increases by 10% to £22,000, they can borrow £110,000, an increase of £10,000 on the previous £100,000. Which would be the same 10% increase.0 -
Well spotted antrobus, I concede that
it made sense to me seeing wage inflation generally 1-2% and seeing rises of 5-10%, and it still means its v difficult to save up without mortgage or with just one significant income
Also deposits are holding back rises, so things like help to buy and shared ownership are intent on getting round that to enable further rises.
Also I think London had the oligarch effect, which could've been a bubble if it weren't for allowing normal rises to catch upThis is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com0 -
If we were coming off a big dip in house prices then it's pretty safe to think about buying. But as we are coming off the largest boom, the largest house price bubble in recent history, yes it's a good question why buy now?
Not why buy ever, because after the next big dip whenever that is, then will be a better time to buy.0 -
Garethgrew wrote: »If we were coming off a big dip in house prices then it's pretty safe to think about buying. But as we are coming off the largest boom, the largest house price bubble in recent history, yes it's a good question why buy now?
Not why buy ever, because after the next big dip whenever that is, then will be a better time to buy.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards