We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Life is so unfair!
Comments
-
Not sure I'd agree that '"mortgage payment as a % of mean take home pay" correlates directly with house prices as a multiple of incomes but hey ho.
It wasnt the one I wanted but couldnt locate the multiples one from HSBC. I recall that one only went through the 90s level just before the credit crunch.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0 -
-
And another thing about today's hard working families.
They want it all right away, detached house, house must be in their preferred area, new furnishings, new car, the latest phone and so on.
I seem to recall my first house was miles away from work in a cheaper area, was a two bed terrace, no ch, no garden, no double glazing. My car was an ancient Morris Minor. We had a tiny b/w to. I wasn't able to save any money, it all went on essentials like mortgage, petrol, food hence no overseas holidays.
The problem also is that kids now need to buy a new car car because it's so cheap, only £149/month, latest phone, £49/month, broadband and Sky TRV, £30/month, Netflix, Now tv, and the list goes on and on, so before they even think about a mortgage, they're shelling out £250+/month!
You need to get your priorities right, and I guess if you think a new car, phone etc is important, then that's your choice so don't bang on about not being able to afford your own home!
Cheers fj0 -
Two bed terrace, surely it was a shoe box in middle of t' road.0
-
And the current NHS staffing and funding issues are just the tip of the iceberg on what is coming over the next 10-15 years...bigfreddiel wrote: »Actually with obesity and diabetes now on the increase life expectancy is probably getting shorter, if it isn't right now it will be soon!
fj0 -
It's not fair that I could not join an occupational Pension Scheme until the 19909s when I was in my mid 40s. First because I was female and then because I was part-time. The legislation giving part-timers the right to join was not passed until about 1996.
Therefore I only paid in for about ten years, because I took early retirement at 55.
Therefore I don't have as much as someone who paid in for forty years.
Not fair.(AKA HRH_MUngo)
Member #10 of £2 savers club
Imagine someone holding forth on biology whose only knowledge of the subject is the Book of British Birds, and you have a rough idea of what it feels like to read Richard Dawkins on theology: Terry Eagleton0 -
And whose going to keep all the people who are clambering to get to the UK from overseas when they reach retiring age and will have paid nothing or next to nothing into the system......................exactly. Im 53 worked all my life I work with a few Polish who openly admit they are here for the benefits the Pension one even shipped his sister over here just to have her baby so the baby would have a british passport now gone back home And please dont even get me started on Public sector pensions gold plated to the hilt which us in the private sector pay into yet they dont return the favour0
-
seven-day-weekend wrote: »It's not fair that I could not join an occupational Pension Scheme until the 19909s when I was in my mid 40s. First because I was female and then because I was part-time. The legislation giving part-timers the right to join was not passed until about 1996.
Therefore I only paid in for about ten years, because I took early retirement at 55.
Therefore I don't have as much as someone who paid in for forty years.
Not fair.
but you could have doubled your entitlement by working until 65 same as most people. Retiring at 55 is not fair.The questions that get the best answers are the questions that give most detail....0 -
...please dont even get me started on Public sector pensions gold plated to the hilt which us in the private sector pay into yet they dont return the favour
Most civil servants have been moved to Alpha, which is much less generous (career average rather than final salary etc).
Despite the generous pension, I can't find people willing to come and work for the salaries I'm allowed to offer, so am having to pay contractors and suppliers to do the work.0 -
please dont even get me started on Public sector pensions gold plated to the hilt which us in the private sector pay into yet they dont return the favour
If you think they are that good (they are good) then why not work in the public sector? I've worked in both, I now work in the public sector for about £55k (pro-rata) plus the pension. When I worked in the private sector I was on today's equivalent of about £70k. I think my public sector salary is more or less in the same ball park of what I earned in the private sector, when you add the pension.Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.6K Spending & Discounts
- 245.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.7K Life & Family
- 259.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 15.9K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
