We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Timeframes
JanChris
Posts: 55 Forumite
I am a bit confused about these timeframes....
1: You go to your bankruptcy hearing and all goes well and you are declared bankrupt.... and possibly told to pay £XX per month to the official receiver for the next 3 years which is split between your creditors. You are now an 'undischarged bankrupt' for the next 12 months.
2. At the end of 12 months you are a 'discharged bankrupt' and your debts are 'wiped out'.
2. For the next 2 years you are still paying the £XX to the OR which he is splitting between your creditors.
Is this correct?? Why are you paying for the next two years if they are 'wiped out'?
1: You go to your bankruptcy hearing and all goes well and you are declared bankrupt.... and possibly told to pay £XX per month to the official receiver for the next 3 years which is split between your creditors. You are now an 'undischarged bankrupt' for the next 12 months.
2. At the end of 12 months you are a 'discharged bankrupt' and your debts are 'wiped out'.
2. For the next 2 years you are still paying the £XX to the OR which he is splitting between your creditors.
Is this correct?? Why are you paying for the next two years if they are 'wiped out'?
0
Comments
-
They are not 'wiped' out. They continue to exist as a debt in the estate.
You are discharged from the liability to your creditors directly, but the law says that if an IPA/O is in place then you have an obligation to pay surplus income to the OR which is part of the bankruptcy estate, and is used to pay the fees of that estate, and any remainder distributed as a dividend to any of it's creditors.
The binding agreement or obligation to pay into the estate under an IPA/0 is a separate one to the original debts, so the discharge from the original debts has no effect on that, and the bankruptcy estate it is paid into also continues to exist after discharge.Free/impartial debt advice: National Debtline | StepChange Debt Charity | Find your local CAB
IVA & fee charging DMP companies: Profits from misery, motivated ONLY by greed0 -
To add to Fermi's excellent explanation.....the 3 years that an IPA/IPO may run, dates from the commencement of the IPA, not the date of petition.
The IPA is an agreement, between the OR and the bankrupt.....not something that is imposed.
If a surplus of income is identified, then the amount agreed in the IPA can be varied if the bankrupt's financial circumstances change during the 3 year term.No, I don't think all other drivers are idiots......but some are determined to change my mind.......0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards