We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Pension with profits fund

Hello, I recently turned 55yrs and have now started to take notice of my pensions. My post is regarding a small pension pot (from a previous employer) that I have with Standard Life. Now that I have started looking at my annual statements, it is causing me some confusion.


I was encouraged to take out the pension in 1988 as part of the opting out of SERPS (which I did). When the pension was sold to the workforce we were told that there would be a guarantee 4% growth per annum regardless of market conditions. My confusion is as follows:


When I look at the fund growth rate (stated on the penultimate page of my statement) its states: "Pension with profit Fund growth rate 1.5%", a "reduction of 2.5%" being taken to allow for inflation (which takes the growth rate up to 4%).


I have had no clarity from Standard Life (or at least their reply doesn't clarify anything from my point of view).


Regards


Could anyone offer some clarity on this e.g. is this correct, as I would have expected the 4% regardless of inflation.

Comments

  • Malthusian
    Malthusian Posts: 11,055 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    The penultimate page of your statement is an illustration, a theoretical guess about what your pension will be worth in the future.

    The most important thing to understand is that you are still getting 4% added onto the pension fund each year and Standard Life are honouring the guarantee. If your pension fund is worth £10,000 now, next year your statement will say £10,400.

    However, £10,400 next year won't be as worth as much as £10,400 is now, due to inflation. The statutory illustration attempts to take this into account by showing the figures "in today's money", which means guessing what the rate of inflation will be and reducing them accordingly. Your pension increases by 4% each year in pounds and pence, but its value in today's money only goes up by 1.5% (if you simply deduct 2.5% inflation from the 4% growth rate).

    Statutory illustrations cause far too much confusion and worry given that they are essentially meaningless. Nobody has any idea what inflation will be over the next 10 or 20 years.
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 121,201 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    As said above, projections can be a pain in the neck when there are guarantees in place. The projections have terms set by the regulator. They are examples based on charges, inflation and a set rate of return (and usually an annuity rate that is below the typical annuity rate currently available).

    The fact that the Std Life WP fund has a 4% guarantee is not factored into the projections. Also, its 4% BEFORE charges. Last one I saw had an annual charge of 2.3%. So, the net benefit of the guarantee was 1.7%

    Projections are not perfect. Too many assumptions and the outcome being shown as 1-3 projection examples. Many advisers have stochastic modelling which gives you a pod chart showing where you are likely to end up in 90% of cases. Or a statistical likelihood of hitting a certain amount. However, these too are based on assumptions but they show the the much wider range of possible outcomes. 1-3 examples on a statement are not enough. You have more chance of winning the lottery than you have of you pension actually hitting one of those three projected figures.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • dunstonh wrote: »
    The fact that the Std Life WP fund has a 4% guarantee is not factored into the projections. Also, its 4% BEFORE charges. Last one I saw had an annual charge of 2.3%. So, the net benefit of the guarantee was 1.7%

    Where are With-Profits charges usually taken from, are they usually adjusted out of the Terminal bonus figure? I only ask as I have a Pru (ex Scot Am) With-Profits pension which also has a 4% guarantee , the accumulated amount on the yearly statement appears to grow by 4% p\a, only the terminal bonus seems to vary. When I asked the Pru they were unable to tell me what the annual charges were that applied to the policy.
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 121,201 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Where are With-Profits charges usually taken from

    It varies depending on type of with profits plan and the provider (and some providers do it different ways depending on version). There is no one method.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • xylophone
    xylophone Posts: 45,940 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    What does your original policy document say about charges?


    http://www.pruadviser.co.uk/content/nav/about/26674/pghome/49880/

    otherwise the technical helpline might assist?
  • Mothman
    Mothman Posts: 299 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper
    xylophone wrote: »
    What does your original policy document say about charges?


    http://www.pruadviser.co.uk/content/nav/about/26674/pghome/49880/

    otherwise the technical helpline might assist?

    Original Scot Am contract says charges of £10 p/a with the caveat that 'charges may be varied by the society'. I guess the Pru could be charging what they like as there appears to be no way of verifying what has been deducted.
  • Thanks for the replies, the illustrations have caused me confusion but the posts have given some clarity to the situation.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.