We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Defending a claim through small claims court

Hi, I'm after some advice as I have defended a claim for repayment of a loan on the grounds that the Claimant's solicitor did not produce a copy of the Credit Agreement or any other supporting documents when I requested them. They said they would ask the client for them and I have heard nothing since. I then received a letter saying they were going to pursue it and I have received notice that it has been allocated to the small claims court. I do not know where to go from here. As far as I am concerned they do not have a case if they cannot provide evidence of the original Credit Agreement. In any event, I believe the debt is statute barred but I feel if I bring this up I am admitting I had the loan.

Comments

  • tomtontom
    tomtontom Posts: 7,929 Forumite
    So you are admitting that you had the loan, that the lender gave you money and you failed to repay it?

    When did you last pay anything towards the debt?
  • lee111s
    lee111s Posts: 2,987 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    You could state in court that IF there was a loan dating back to the dates they are claming then you understand it would now be statue barred. If they can't prove you had the loan I don't see where they have a case?

    Did you make any payments to the loan?
  • Who is the lender?

    When did they lend to you?

    When did you make the last repayment or acknowlesge the debt?

    What if they produce a reconstituted copy of the agreement (which has been proven at a higher court as acceptable) - where does this leave your argument - is this your only defence.

    I find it hard to believe that solicitors would spend money on a court case if they believe it to be statute barred.

    OP we need more info from you.
  • The lender was originally GE captial then it changed to Hitachi who then sold the debt to Cabot. I think the loan was taken out in 2005. I haven't made any payments for well over 6 years, or been in communication with them. I believe solicitors will pursue even if it is statute barred cos they are hoping people won't know about it, and I assume if the defendant doesn't bring it up they Court will allow it to continue.

    They haven't provided any dates or copies of any documentation.
  • In that case see the top of this page - find the template letter for a statute barred loan and send it to them.
  • Thanks, where abouts can I find the templates? I am new to this site TIA
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.