We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Glazing and 'acceptable quality'

I'm currently having glazing installed and I've so far noticed probably 50% of the panels have small amounts of dust on the inside of the sealed unit or scratches/marks on the internal panel (triple glazing).

Obviously I have flagged this up with the installers and they agreed that some of the panels will need to be replaced once the install has been completed. I'm concerned that given at the moment it appears quite a large number of panels will need to be replaced the company may try to push back and say that a certain amount of dust is to be expected or that imperfections under a certain size are acceptable.

My question is that if they try to push back on replacing all of the panels I consider to be faulty, is there a legally accepted / tested definition of what is deemed to be of acceptable quality when it comes to sealed glazing units?

My view is that the 'sealed units' components should be checked for any damage/imperfections and 'sealed' in a dust free environment. This isn't rocket science. No trapped dust or other imperfections are acceptable. To draw an analogy if I were picking up a new car from the dealers and it already had some scuffs or scratches I wouldn't accept it - I don't see this as any different (particularly given a full house of windows and doors costs as much as a new car!).

I have currently only paid 20% of the total with another 30% due on completion and then 50% will be on finance. I believe this should give me some leverage if there is a dispute.

Hopefully there won't be a dispute but I would like to be fully informed should things go that way.

Thanks

Comments

  • unholyangel
    unholyangel Posts: 16,866 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    It really comes down to what a reasonable person would regard as satisfactory quality.
    (2A)For the purposes of this Act, goods are of satisfactory quality if they meet the standard that a reasonable person would regard as satisfactory, taking account of any description of the goods, the price (if relevant) and all the other relevant circumstances.

    I suppose it depends how fussy you're being. A few tiny specks that are only visible with your face near pressed up on the glass might be acceptable where a spattering of dust visible from several meters away wouldnt be (imo anyway).
    You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.