We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Need Help with Statute Barred Defence

2»

Comments

  • DandelionPatrol
    DandelionPatrol Posts: 1,313 Forumite
    fermi wrote: »
    That fact is covered on what I originally posted, as payment or acknowledgement is actually fresh accrual of the cause of action, (s29 Fresh accrual of action on acknowledgment or part payment) so that statement covers the original accrual and subsequent accrual on payment or acknowledgement. But yes, does not harm to spell it out more clearly like that.
    For OP, without solicitor, it would be essential to spell it out. If OP takes this into court and the other side are even half switched on, he would be quite vulnerable to ambush on your words if he did not really know what they mean.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.