We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

IHT and potentially exempt gifts

Options
kkgree1
kkgree1 Posts: 328 Forumite
Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
edited 21 July 2015 at 4:04PM in Cutting tax
A family member has recently sold their main property and wishes to gift around 100k to each of her two children.

Although she lives full-time in a care home, they have planned accordingly and she does not have to worry about deprivation of assets as the care fees are paid from another source of income.

I am trying to help her find out about the 7 year rule on gifts as the children are concerned that they would be liable for IHT on the potential gift, if for any reason she does not live for 7 years. They are the only beneficiaries of her will - can anyone confirm whether the IHT on non-exempt gifts can be paid directly out of the residual estate or whether it would need to be met by both children?

This will make a difference as one plans to use the gift to fund an extension and needs to know whether the potential IHT money should be kept aside to pay HMRC if needed!

She is a divorcee so there is no transfer of allowance applicable.

Many thanks
Mortgage free wannabe
Mortgage (November 2010) £135,850
Mortgage (November 2020) £4,784

Comments

  • getmore4less
    getmore4less Posts: 46,882 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper I've helped Parliament
    edited 21 July 2015 at 4:08PM
    The gifts use up the nil rate band first, then the estate is taxed with whats left of the nil rate band.

    It is very rare that a recipient of a PET(where the total of the PETS are below the nil rate band) gets chased for tax because the estate can't pay.

    eg if she gifts £200k then the nil rate band of the este is £125k(+ any transferable nil rate band)


    Some may say you add the value back into the estate but that is not the mechanism used by HMRC.
  • Morganic
    Morganic Posts: 11 Forumite
    For the estate to be liable for IHT then its total value would have to exceed 325K including the 200K in gifts (assuming here a death wining seven years). But means the residual estate would still have 125K in it - enough to pay any IHT due.

    So there is no need for the gift recipients to retain 40% of the gifts.

    Incidentally, holdings in qualifying AIM shares become exempt in just two years. So if time is of the essence, the funds could instead be used to buy AIM shares, which would become exempt in just those two years, and then gifted in specie.

    AIM shares are more risky, of course, but a diversified portfolio of AIM shares that pay dividends could work
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.