We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
"Cyclists Prohibited"
Options
Comments
-
The "not recommended" would be because it would not be a particularly pleasant experience - "dangerous for cyclists" would be more accurate if this is the case but I'm not convinced DC adds danger, as it mainly adds discomfort due to higher traffic speeds. If a motorist is blind enough not to be able to see a cyclist cycling normally then they should not be driving.I wonder, if you rode on this section and were hit by a car, if the 'not recommended' sign would count against you in any court case? "M'Lud, the plaintiff was clearly the author of his own misfortune, as he deliberately and recklessly ignored a sign put there by the authorities which was plainly intended to protect him from this kind of incident. I move the case be dismissed."0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.8K Life & Family
- 257.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards