We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Auto-enrolled, should I opt out?

13»

Comments

  • edinburgher
    edinburgher Posts: 14,079 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 6 July 2015 at 8:17PM
    But cheaper than the VLS80.

    Can you explain how it's cheaper to be charged 0.3% + £1.50/mth?

    For your example of VLS80, I believe OP invests with Charles Stanley Direct. Isn't she paying 0.49%/year with the TER and platform charge considered? With roughly £1,000 invested, shouldn't she be paying less than £5/year in charges?

    Are the charges for the same amount in her employer pension not over 2%? 0.3% + £18 as a proportion of £1,000?

    Edit: missed this:
    Capped at 0.75%. What are yours?

    But still dearer than the ISA?
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 120,140 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Can you explain how it's cheaper to be charged 0.3% + £1.50/mth?

    For your example of VLS80, I believe OP invests with Charles Stanley Direct. Isn't she paying 0.49%/year with the TER and platform charge considered? With roughly £1,000 invested, shouldn't she be paying less than £5/year in charges?

    The pension was 0.3% for product/provider/fund. Pension funds use the OCF as the annual charge. So, ignoring the £1.50 you have 0.3% p.a. vs 0.49% (if its CSD). If its not CSD then it will be higher.

    The £1.50 is an unknown but with auto-enrolment rules, that is more likely to be initial charge due to annual charge cap. It would be good to know that one way or the other.

    You then have the free money from the employer giving you a 100% gain overnight. The VLS wont beat that.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • edinburgher
    edinburgher Posts: 14,079 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 6 July 2015 at 9:31PM
    You then have the free money from the employer giving you a 100% gain overnight.

    I agree 100%, have always bitten the hand off any employer willing to give me free money :)
    The VLS wont beat that.

    VLS held in an ISA won't beat VLS held in a pension. If, however, this is a NEST pension, it won't be an option, will it?
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 120,140 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    VLS held in an ISA won't beat VLS held in a pension. If, however, this is a NEST pension, it won't be an option, will it?

    The same fund in either wrapper would grow the same. However, most pensions have similar funds that do as good a job (or better or worse)
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • edinburgher
    edinburgher Posts: 14,079 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    The same fund in either wrapper would grow the same

    I appreciate that, but pension would have tax relief as you have already stated.
  • jem16
    jem16 Posts: 19,723 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    I appreciate that, but pension would have tax relief as you have already stated.


    On which you may have to pay tax on withdrawal. The only gain may be the tax free lump sum.
  • edinburgher
    edinburgher Posts: 14,079 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    jem16 wrote: »
    On which you may have to pay tax on withdrawal. The only gain may be the tax free lump sum.

    Unless you avoid tax on withdrawal :)
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.