We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Auto-enrolled, should I opt out?
Comments
-
But cheaper than the VLS80.
Can you explain how it's cheaper to be charged 0.3% + £1.50/mth?
For your example of VLS80, I believe OP invests with Charles Stanley Direct. Isn't she paying 0.49%/year with the TER and platform charge considered? With roughly £1,000 invested, shouldn't she be paying less than £5/year in charges?
Are the charges for the same amount in her employer pension not over 2%? 0.3% + £18 as a proportion of £1,000?
Edit: missed this:Capped at 0.75%. What are yours?
But still dearer than the ISA?0 -
Can you explain how it's cheaper to be charged 0.3% + £1.50/mth?
For your example of VLS80, I believe OP invests with Charles Stanley Direct. Isn't she paying 0.49%/year with the TER and platform charge considered? With roughly £1,000 invested, shouldn't she be paying less than £5/year in charges?
The pension was 0.3% for product/provider/fund. Pension funds use the OCF as the annual charge. So, ignoring the £1.50 you have 0.3% p.a. vs 0.49% (if its CSD). If its not CSD then it will be higher.
The £1.50 is an unknown but with auto-enrolment rules, that is more likely to be initial charge due to annual charge cap. It would be good to know that one way or the other.
You then have the free money from the employer giving you a 100% gain overnight. The VLS wont beat that.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0 -
You then have the free money from the employer giving you a 100% gain overnight.
I agree 100%, have always bitten the hand off any employer willing to give me free moneyThe VLS wont beat that.
VLS held in an ISA won't beat VLS held in a pension. If, however, this is a NEST pension, it won't be an option, will it?0 -
VLS held in an ISA won't beat VLS held in a pension. If, however, this is a NEST pension, it won't be an option, will it?
The same fund in either wrapper would grow the same. However, most pensions have similar funds that do as good a job (or better or worse)I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0 -
The same fund in either wrapper would grow the same
I appreciate that, but pension would have tax relief as you have already stated.0 -
edinburgher wrote: »I appreciate that, but pension would have tax relief as you have already stated.
On which you may have to pay tax on withdrawal. The only gain may be the tax free lump sum.0 -
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards