We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Selling after an intrest only mortgage

Hi if someone has a intrest only mortgage and it comes to end of term and mortgage provider was to sell the house to make there money back would "current owners" get any money or would it just sell to cover remaining mortgage? ( hope this makes sense)
2016 was both financially and emotionally. 2017 will be our year.

Comments

  • jamesd
    jamesd Posts: 26,103 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 1 July 2015 at 7:01AM
    The owner gets any money left over and is liable for any shortfall. An owner selling will normally get a better price than a mortgage company selling so if a sale is required, best to do it that way. If the proposed asking price or agreed sale price is less than the amount of the mortgage, the mortgage lender must agree to the sale or it can't continue.

    The mortgage holder would only sell after repossession or the less explicit way of handing the keys back to them. Any credible repayment plan should be sufficient to prevent repossession. Credibility depends on things like age and income. Downsizing or relocating to a cheaper part of the country could also help solve some problems, if the property value is far enough in excess of the mortgage or the mortgage lender is willing to provide another mortgage to facilitate this and reduce their exposure.

    If other debts that are not secured are an issue, there are alternative ways of dealing with those, like IVA or bankruptcy.

    To say much more we'd really need to know far more about the overall situation, to assess whether there are other options. Lenders are typically obliged by FCA requirements to at least try to find solutions that don't involve selling a home. Those don't apply to business loans, like those for BTL property.
  • Contemptuous
    Contemptuous Posts: 516 Forumite
    That's not how it works..

    So there's no provision to repay the interest only mortgage? Was it always the intention to sell the property to repay it?

    The lender wouldn't sell the property unless it was repossessed. It would be the owners who would put the property on the market, therefore it can be priced at whatever they want and, any money left once the mortgage was repaid would be the vendor's to keep.
    Slummy mummy!
  • jamesd
    jamesd Posts: 26,103 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    It would be the owners who would put the property on the market, therefore it can be priced at whatever they want
    Ensuring that the mortgage charge on the property is going to be removed is one of the tasks for a buyer's conveyancer. The deal just will not proceed until the conveyancer is satisfied that it will happen.

    Strictly that does allow a sale price below the mortgage value if other funds are available to repay the remainder of the mortgage.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.