We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
if Goerge Osbourne takes away tax benefit for BTL won't rents just go up?
Comments
-
chucknorris wrote: »The market rent rate is a function of supply and demand, if the ability to claim mortgage interest was withdrawn (it won't be) there would be a very significant reduction in supply. So rents would increase, not so much because landlords put the rents up, but because the supply of property available for rent would be reduced.
There could well be a very significant reduction in the supply of rented housing, but I would anticipate little change in the supply of housing overall. Presumably, landlords who withdraw property from the rental market will sell, and the buyers of said property will live in it themselves, thereby reducing the demand for rented property.0 -
There could well be a very significant reduction in the supply of rented housing, but I would anticipate little change in the supply of housing overall. Presumably, landlords who withdraw property from the rental market will sell, and the buyers of said property will live in it themselves, thereby reducing the demand for rented property.
Obviously! That's exactly what I said, you seem to have missed this bit of my post:
'because the supply of property available for rent would be reduced'
I never said that housing would be reduced, I said rents would fall because the supply of rented property would fall.Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop0 -
Graham_Devon wrote: »Offsetting mortgage interest payments. Claiming for wear and tear - even if there wasn't any cash spent on wear and tear. Loopholes that allow the richer end of BTL to avoid capital gains.
Tax breaks for BTL's are estimated to "cost" the rest of us £5bn a year. (Inter generational Foundation report in 2013).
Though this article in 2015 puts the total tax loss at £14bn
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/may/26/landlords-14bn-tax-breaks-buy-to-let-expansion-mortgage-interest
BTL is a business like any other. Too simplistic to say that people let property just for tax breaks. Whether it will remain a fad is another matter. As historically was the domain of the capital rich. Leveraging with debt is a double edged sword. I would question how many people fully understand the risks involved. Until it's too late.0 -
Why would the supply of property to rent be reduced? Landlords selling up? Does that mean a reduction in price for buyers? And if someone buys, that is one less person wanting to rent.
Not in London (where my property is) where rental accommodation is required because not everyone stays there long enough to buy, or doesn't know initially if they are going to stay long enough or couldn't afford it anyway, the London rental market will always be strong. I think I might actually be better off! My average mortgage rate is only 1%, so losing 0.4% tax relief on that is insignificant, and probably worth losing if it gets rid of some landlords without low margin tracker mortgages, and when rates go back up I'm probably going to sell anyway, so I don't feel threatened by that (in fact if they went up tomorrow, I would seriously looking at selling right now).
EDIT: But it aint gonna happen, there is no way that mortgage interest offset against tax is going to change.Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop0 -
How are you managing a 1% mortgage rate Chuck?0
-
Why would the supply of property to rent be reduced? Landlords selling up? Does that mean a reduction in price for buyers? And if someone buys, that is one less person wanting to rent.
rather depends
certainly if a person currently flat sharing buys a property and then shares with mates then no change in demand for properties
but if e.g. a FTB currently flat sharing buys a property and lives in it my themselves or with just a partner then it's likely there will be see an increase in prices for rental properties.0 -
How are you managing a 1% mortgage rate Chuck?
Very nicely thankyou, I should imagine :-)0 -
How are you managing a 1% mortgage rate Chuck?
As you can imagine loving it! I have to pinch myself to check it isn't a dream, I reckon you probably know that feeling?Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop0 -
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.8K Spending & Discounts
- 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards